Comanagement of coral reef social-ecological systems

In an effort to deliver better outcomes for people and the ecosystems they depend on, many governments and civil society groups are engaging natural resource users in collaborative management arrangements (frequently called comanagement). However, there are few empirical studies demonstrating the so...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2012-04, Vol.109 (14), p.5219-5222
Hauptverfasser: Cinner, Joshua E, McClanahan, Tim R, MacNeil, M. Aaron, Graham, Nicholas A. J, Daw, Tim M, Mukminin, Ahmad, Feary, David A, Rabearisoa, Ando L, Wamukota, Andrew, Jiddawi, Narriman, Campbell, Stuart J, Baird, Andrew H, Januchowski-Hartley, Fraser A, Hamed, Salum, Lahari, Rachael, Morove, Tau, Kuange, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In an effort to deliver better outcomes for people and the ecosystems they depend on, many governments and civil society groups are engaging natural resource users in collaborative management arrangements (frequently called comanagement). However, there are few empirical studies demonstrating the social and institutional conditions conducive to successful comanagement outcomes, especially in small-scale fisheries. Here, we evaluate 42 comanagement arrangements across five countries and show that: (i) comanagement is largely successful at meeting social and ecological goals; (ii) comanagement tends to benefit wealthier resource users; (iii) resource overexploitation is most strongly influenced by market access and users’ dependence on resources; and (iv) institutional characteristics strongly influence livelihood and compliance outcomes, yet have little effect on ecological conditions.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1121215109