The impact of geographic inequality in federal research funding: A comparative longitudinal study of research and scholarly outputs in EPSCoR versus non-EPSCoR states
Some states in the U.S. have traditionally received less federal research funding than other states. The National Science Foundation (NSF) created a program in 1979, called the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) to enhance the research competitiveness in such states. Whi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0286991-e0286991 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0286991 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e0286991 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Mohammadi, Ehsan Olejniczak, Anthony J Walker, George E Nagarkatti, Prakash |
description | Some states in the U.S. have traditionally received less federal research funding than other states. The National Science Foundation (NSF) created a program in 1979, called the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) to enhance the research competitiveness in such states. While the geographic disparity in federal research funding is well known, the overall impact of federal funding on the research performance of EPSCoR and non-EPSCoR has not been previously studied. In the current study, we compared the combined research productivity of Ph.D. granting institutions in EPSCoR versus the non-EPSCoR states to better understand the scientific impact of federal investments in sponsored research across all states. The research outputs we measured included journal articles, books, conference papers, patents, and citation count in academic literature. Unsurprisingly, results indicated that the non-EPSCoR states received significantly more federal research funding than their EPSCoR counterparts, which correlated with a higher number of faculty members in the non-EPSCoR versus EPSCoR states. Also, in the overall research productivity expressed on a per capita, the non-EPSCoR states fared better than EPSCoR states. However, when the research output was measured based on per $1M investment of federal research funding, EPSCoR states performed significantly better than the non-EPSCoR states in many research productivity indicators, with the notable exception of patents. Together, this study found preliminary evidence that EPSCoR states achieved a high degree of research productivity despite receiving significantly fewer federal research dollars. The limitations and next steps of this study are also discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0286991 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2826707062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A753191798</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fa7a2d932ec84db0bb7b50ed2034610c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A753191798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-eaddfdd0a4ace7943354241e5669840698f9036a5fea5bdfef3a78a3062c23ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk8Fu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsISE47OLYSZxwQVVVYKVKRW3has3ak8RV1t7aTkVfiOfE26arLuoBRUpGM9__2x5nsux1Tuc5F_mnSzd6C8N87SzOKaurpsmfZPt5w9msYpQ_fRDvZS9CuKS05HVVPc_2uOBMsILvZ38ueiRmtQYViWtJh67zsO6NIsbi1QiDiTcpJC1q9DAQjwHBq560o9XGdp_JIVEu6T1Ec41kcLYzcUylBIcU3GxstyqwmgTVuwH8kCpjXI8xbPyPf5wfuTNyjT6MgVhnZ1MmRIgYXmbPWhgCvpq-B9nPr8cXR99nJ6ffFkeHJzNVNTzOELRutaZQgELRFJyXBStyLKuqqQuaXm1DeQVli1AudYstB1EDpxVTjAPyg-ztne96cEFOLQ6S1awSVCQsEYs7Qju4lGtvVuBvpAMjbxPOdxJ8NGpA2YIAptMdoKoLvaTLpViWFHW6kKLKqUpeX6bVxuUKtUIbU493THcr1vSyc9cyp0yURUGTw4fJwburEUOUKxMUDgNYdOPtxgUrecl4Qt_9gz5-vInqIJ3A2NalhdXGVB6KkudNLpo6UfNHqPRoXBmVfsjWpPyO4OOOIDERf8cOxhDk4vzs_9nTX7vs-wdsjzDEPrhhjMbZsAsWd6DyLgSP7bbLOZWbebrvhtzMk5zmKcnePLyhreh-gPhfNJ8eFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2826707062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of geographic inequality in federal research funding: A comparative longitudinal study of research and scholarly outputs in EPSCoR versus non-EPSCoR states</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mohammadi, Ehsan ; Olejniczak, Anthony J ; Walker, George E ; Nagarkatti, Prakash</creator><contributor>Haunschild, Robin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi, Ehsan ; Olejniczak, Anthony J ; Walker, George E ; Nagarkatti, Prakash ; Haunschild, Robin</creatorcontrib><description>Some states in the U.S. have traditionally received less federal research funding than other states. The National Science Foundation (NSF) created a program in 1979, called the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) to enhance the research competitiveness in such states. While the geographic disparity in federal research funding is well known, the overall impact of federal funding on the research performance of EPSCoR and non-EPSCoR has not been previously studied. In the current study, we compared the combined research productivity of Ph.D. granting institutions in EPSCoR versus the non-EPSCoR states to better understand the scientific impact of federal investments in sponsored research across all states. The research outputs we measured included journal articles, books, conference papers, patents, and citation count in academic literature. Unsurprisingly, results indicated that the non-EPSCoR states received significantly more federal research funding than their EPSCoR counterparts, which correlated with a higher number of faculty members in the non-EPSCoR versus EPSCoR states. Also, in the overall research productivity expressed on a per capita, the non-EPSCoR states fared better than EPSCoR states. However, when the research output was measured based on per $1M investment of federal research funding, EPSCoR states performed significantly better than the non-EPSCoR states in many research productivity indicators, with the notable exception of patents. Together, this study found preliminary evidence that EPSCoR states achieved a high degree of research productivity despite receiving significantly fewer federal research dollars. The limitations and next steps of this study are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286991</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37327243</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Author productivity ; Citation analysis ; Comparative analysis ; Competition ; Competitiveness ; Earth Sciences ; Education ; Evaluation ; Funding ; Geospatial data ; Government agencies ; Government finance ; Jurisdiction ; Longitudinal studies ; People and places ; Productivity ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research funding ; Research grants ; Science Policy ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0286991-e0286991</ispartof><rights>Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-eaddfdd0a4ace7943354241e5669840698f9036a5fea5bdfef3a78a3062c23ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-eaddfdd0a4ace7943354241e5669840698f9036a5fea5bdfef3a78a3062c23ae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2663-0759 ; 0000-0002-4666-8933</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275440/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275440/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37327243$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Haunschild, Robin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olejniczak, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, George E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarkatti, Prakash</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of geographic inequality in federal research funding: A comparative longitudinal study of research and scholarly outputs in EPSCoR versus non-EPSCoR states</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Some states in the U.S. have traditionally received less federal research funding than other states. The National Science Foundation (NSF) created a program in 1979, called the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) to enhance the research competitiveness in such states. While the geographic disparity in federal research funding is well known, the overall impact of federal funding on the research performance of EPSCoR and non-EPSCoR has not been previously studied. In the current study, we compared the combined research productivity of Ph.D. granting institutions in EPSCoR versus the non-EPSCoR states to better understand the scientific impact of federal investments in sponsored research across all states. The research outputs we measured included journal articles, books, conference papers, patents, and citation count in academic literature. Unsurprisingly, results indicated that the non-EPSCoR states received significantly more federal research funding than their EPSCoR counterparts, which correlated with a higher number of faculty members in the non-EPSCoR versus EPSCoR states. Also, in the overall research productivity expressed on a per capita, the non-EPSCoR states fared better than EPSCoR states. However, when the research output was measured based on per $1M investment of federal research funding, EPSCoR states performed significantly better than the non-EPSCoR states in many research productivity indicators, with the notable exception of patents. Together, this study found preliminary evidence that EPSCoR states achieved a high degree of research productivity despite receiving significantly fewer federal research dollars. The limitations and next steps of this study are also discussed.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Citation analysis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Geospatial data</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Government finance</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research funding</subject><subject>Research grants</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk8Fu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsISE47OLYSZxwQVVVYKVKRW3has3ak8RV1t7aTkVfiOfE26arLuoBRUpGM9__2x5nsux1Tuc5F_mnSzd6C8N87SzOKaurpsmfZPt5w9msYpQ_fRDvZS9CuKS05HVVPc_2uOBMsILvZ38ueiRmtQYViWtJh67zsO6NIsbi1QiDiTcpJC1q9DAQjwHBq560o9XGdp_JIVEu6T1Ec41kcLYzcUylBIcU3GxstyqwmgTVuwH8kCpjXI8xbPyPf5wfuTNyjT6MgVhnZ1MmRIgYXmbPWhgCvpq-B9nPr8cXR99nJ6ffFkeHJzNVNTzOELRutaZQgELRFJyXBStyLKuqqQuaXm1DeQVli1AudYstB1EDpxVTjAPyg-ztne96cEFOLQ6S1awSVCQsEYs7Qju4lGtvVuBvpAMjbxPOdxJ8NGpA2YIAptMdoKoLvaTLpViWFHW6kKLKqUpeX6bVxuUKtUIbU493THcr1vSyc9cyp0yURUGTw4fJwburEUOUKxMUDgNYdOPtxgUrecl4Qt_9gz5-vInqIJ3A2NalhdXGVB6KkudNLpo6UfNHqPRoXBmVfsjWpPyO4OOOIDERf8cOxhDk4vzs_9nTX7vs-wdsjzDEPrhhjMbZsAsWd6DyLgSP7bbLOZWbebrvhtzMk5zmKcnePLyhreh-gPhfNJ8eFQ</recordid><startdate>20230616</startdate><enddate>20230616</enddate><creator>Mohammadi, Ehsan</creator><creator>Olejniczak, Anthony J</creator><creator>Walker, George E</creator><creator>Nagarkatti, Prakash</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2663-0759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4666-8933</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230616</creationdate><title>The impact of geographic inequality in federal research funding: A comparative longitudinal study of research and scholarly outputs in EPSCoR versus non-EPSCoR states</title><author>Mohammadi, Ehsan ; Olejniczak, Anthony J ; Walker, George E ; Nagarkatti, Prakash</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-eaddfdd0a4ace7943354241e5669840698f9036a5fea5bdfef3a78a3062c23ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Citation analysis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Geospatial data</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Government finance</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research funding</topic><topic>Research grants</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olejniczak, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, George E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarkatti, Prakash</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohammadi, Ehsan</au><au>Olejniczak, Anthony J</au><au>Walker, George E</au><au>Nagarkatti, Prakash</au><au>Haunschild, Robin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of geographic inequality in federal research funding: A comparative longitudinal study of research and scholarly outputs in EPSCoR versus non-EPSCoR states</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-06-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0286991</spage><epage>e0286991</epage><pages>e0286991-e0286991</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Some states in the U.S. have traditionally received less federal research funding than other states. The National Science Foundation (NSF) created a program in 1979, called the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) to enhance the research competitiveness in such states. While the geographic disparity in federal research funding is well known, the overall impact of federal funding on the research performance of EPSCoR and non-EPSCoR has not been previously studied. In the current study, we compared the combined research productivity of Ph.D. granting institutions in EPSCoR versus the non-EPSCoR states to better understand the scientific impact of federal investments in sponsored research across all states. The research outputs we measured included journal articles, books, conference papers, patents, and citation count in academic literature. Unsurprisingly, results indicated that the non-EPSCoR states received significantly more federal research funding than their EPSCoR counterparts, which correlated with a higher number of faculty members in the non-EPSCoR versus EPSCoR states. Also, in the overall research productivity expressed on a per capita, the non-EPSCoR states fared better than EPSCoR states. However, when the research output was measured based on per $1M investment of federal research funding, EPSCoR states performed significantly better than the non-EPSCoR states in many research productivity indicators, with the notable exception of patents. Together, this study found preliminary evidence that EPSCoR states achieved a high degree of research productivity despite receiving significantly fewer federal research dollars. The limitations and next steps of this study are also discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37327243</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0286991</doi><tpages>e0286991</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2663-0759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4666-8933</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0286991-e0286991 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2826707062 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analysis Author productivity Citation analysis Comparative analysis Competition Competitiveness Earth Sciences Education Evaluation Funding Geospatial data Government agencies Government finance Jurisdiction Longitudinal studies People and places Productivity Research and Analysis Methods Research funding Research grants Science Policy Social Sciences |
title | The impact of geographic inequality in federal research funding: A comparative longitudinal study of research and scholarly outputs in EPSCoR versus non-EPSCoR states |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T01%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20geographic%20inequality%20in%20federal%20research%20funding:%20A%20comparative%20longitudinal%20study%20of%20research%20and%20scholarly%20outputs%20in%20EPSCoR%20versus%20non-EPSCoR%20states&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Mohammadi,%20Ehsan&rft.date=2023-06-16&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0286991&rft.epage=e0286991&rft.pages=e0286991-e0286991&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0286991&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA753191798%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2826707062&rft_id=info:pmid/37327243&rft_galeid=A753191798&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_fa7a2d932ec84db0bb7b50ed2034610c&rfr_iscdi=true |