A comparison of host response strategies to distinguish bacterial and viral infection

Compare three host response strategies to distinguish bacterial and viral etiologies of acute respiratory illness (ARI). In this observational cohort study, procalcitonin, a 3-protein panel (CRP, IP-10, TRAIL), and a host gene expression mRNA panel were measured in 286 subjects with ARI from four em...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0261385-e0261385
Hauptverfasser: Ross, Melissa, Henao, Ricardo, Burke, Thomas W, Ko, Emily R, McClain, Micah T, Ginsburg, Geoffrey S, Woods, Christopher W, Tsalik, Ephraim L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Compare three host response strategies to distinguish bacterial and viral etiologies of acute respiratory illness (ARI). In this observational cohort study, procalcitonin, a 3-protein panel (CRP, IP-10, TRAIL), and a host gene expression mRNA panel were measured in 286 subjects with ARI from four emergency departments. Multinomial logistic regression and leave-one-out cross validation were used to evaluate the protein and mRNA tests. The mRNA panel performed better than alternative strategies to identify bacterial infection: AUC 0.93 vs. 0.83 for the protein panel and 0.84 for procalcitonin (P
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0261385