On the open-source landscape of PLOS Computational Biology

Recently, following an editorial by N.S. on reproducibility and the future of MRI research [2], we wrote a blog post presenting an analysis of the open-source landscape for the journal Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (MRM), which broadly focuses on MRI research for medical applications. Using open-so...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS computational biology 2021-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e1008725-e1008725
Hauptverfasser: Boudreau, Mathieu, Poline, Jean-Baptiste, Bellec, Pierre, Stikov, Nikola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recently, following an editorial by N.S. on reproducibility and the future of MRI research [2], we wrote a blog post presenting an analysis of the open-source landscape for the journal Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (MRM), which broadly focuses on MRI research for medical applications. Using open-source languages like Python opens the gateway to a wide selection of other open-source tools (e.g., continuous integration, Jupyter Notebook, Binder, etc.) which are mostly incompatible with licensed software like MATLAB. Reproducibility tools used by percentage. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008725.t002 In addition to sharing code, an emerging trend in the open science community is to provide an easily reproducible coding environment that requires only a web browser to run demos or reproduce figures.
ISSN:1553-7358
1553-734X
1553-7358
DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008725