Measurement reproducibility of slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping sequences over 20 months: A single center study
Quantifying reproducibility of native T1 and T2 mapping over a long period (> 1 year) is necessary to assess whether changes in T1 and T2 over repeated sessions in a longitudinal study are associated with variability due to underlying tissue composition or technical confounders. To carry out a si...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2019-07, Vol.14 (7), p.e0220190-e0220190 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Quantifying reproducibility of native T1 and T2 mapping over a long period (> 1 year) is necessary to assess whether changes in T1 and T2 over repeated sessions in a longitudinal study are associated with variability due to underlying tissue composition or technical confounders.
To carry out a single-center phantom study to 1) investigate measurement reproducibility of slice-interleaved T1 (STONE) and T2 mapping over 20 months, 2) quantify sources of variability, and 3) compare reproducibility and measurements against reference spin-echo measurements.
MR imaging was performed on a 1.5 Tesla Philips Achieva scanner every 2-3 weeks over 20 months using the T1MES phantom. In each session, slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping was repeated 3 times for 5 slices, and maps were reconstructed using both 2-parameter and 3-parameter fit models. Reproducibility between sessions, and repeatability between repetitions and slices were evaluated using coefficients of variation (CV). Different sources of variability were quantified using variance decomposition analysis. The slice-interleaved measurement was compared to the spin-echo reference and MOLLI.
Slice-interleaved T1 had excellent reproducibility and repeatability with a CV < 2%. The main sources of T1 variability were temperature in 2-parameter maps, and slice in 3-parameter maps. Superior between-session reproducibility to the spin-echo T1 was shown in 2-parameter maps, and similar reproducibility in 3-parameter maps. Superior reproducibility to MOLLI T1 was also shown. Similar measurements to the spin-echo T1 were observed with linear regression slopes of 0.94-0.99, but slight underestimation. Slice-interleaved T2 showed good reproducibility and repeatability with a CV < 7%. The main source of T2 variability was slice location/orientation. Between-session reproducibility was lower than the spin-echo T2 reference and showed good measurement agreement with linear regression slopes of 0.78-1.06.
Slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping sequences yield excellent long-term reproducibility over 20 months. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0220190 |