Multivariate linear regression analysis to identify general factors for quantitative predictions of implant stability quotient values

This study identified potential general influencing factors for a mathematical prediction of implant stability quotient (ISQ) values in clinical practice. We collected the ISQ values of 557 implants from 2 different brands (SICace and Osstem) placed by 2 surgeons in 336 patients. Surgeon 1 placed 32...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e0187010-e0187010
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Hairong, Xu, Zanzan, Shao, Xianhong, Wismeijer, Daniel, Sun, Ping, Wang, Jingxiao, Wu, Gang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study identified potential general influencing factors for a mathematical prediction of implant stability quotient (ISQ) values in clinical practice. We collected the ISQ values of 557 implants from 2 different brands (SICace and Osstem) placed by 2 surgeons in 336 patients. Surgeon 1 placed 329 SICace implants, and surgeon 2 placed 113 SICace implants and 115 Osstem implants. ISQ measurements were taken at T1 (immediately after implant placement) and T2 (before dental restoration). A multivariate linear regression model was used to analyze the influence of the following 11 candidate factors for stability prediction: sex, age, maxillary/mandibular location, bone type, immediate/delayed implantation, bone grafting, insertion torque, I-stage or II-stage healing pattern, implant diameter, implant length and T1-T2 time interval. The need for bone grafting as a predictor significantly influenced ISQ values in all three groups at T1 (weight coefficients ranging from -4 to -5). In contrast, implant diameter consistently influenced the ISQ values in all three groups at T2 (weight coefficients ranging from 3.4 to 4.2). Other factors, such as sex, age, I/II-stage implantation and bone type, did not significantly influence ISQ values at T2, and implant length did not significantly influence ISQ values at T1 or T2. These findings provide a rational basis for mathematical models to quantitatively predict the ISQ values of implants in clinical practice.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187010