Metro passengers' route choice model and its application considering perceived transfer threshold

With the rapid development of the Metro network in China, the greatly increased route alternatives make passengers' route choice behavior and passenger flow assignment more complicated, which presents challenges to the operation management. In this paper, a path sized logit model is adopted to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e0185349-e0185349
Hauptverfasser: Jin, Fanglei, Yao, Enjian, Zhang, Yongsheng, Liu, Shasha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:With the rapid development of the Metro network in China, the greatly increased route alternatives make passengers' route choice behavior and passenger flow assignment more complicated, which presents challenges to the operation management. In this paper, a path sized logit model is adopted to analyze passengers' route choice preferences considering such parameters as in-vehicle time, number of transfers, and transfer time. Moreover, the "perceived transfer threshold" is defined and included in the utility function to reflect the penalty difference caused by transfer time on passengers' perceived utility under various numbers of transfers. Next, based on the revealed preference data collected in the Guangzhou Metro, the proposed model is calibrated. The appropriate perceived transfer threshold value and the route choice preferences are analyzed. Finally, the model is applied to a personalized route planning case to demonstrate the engineering practicability of route choice behavior analysis. The results show that the introduction of the perceived transfer threshold is helpful to improve the model's explanatory abilities. In addition, personalized route planning based on route choice preferences can meet passengers' diversified travel demands.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0185349