Diagnostic utility of whole body Dixon MRI in multiple myeloma: A multi-reader study

To determine which of four Dixon image types [in-phase (IP), out-of-phase (OP), fat only (FO) and water-only (WO)] is most sensitive for detecting multiple myeloma (MM) focal lesions on whole body MRI (WB-MRI) images. Thirty patients with clinically-suspected MM underwent WB-MRI at 3 Tesla. Unenhanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2017-07, Vol.12 (7), p.e0180562-e0180562
Hauptverfasser: Bray, Timothy J P, Singh, Saurabh, Latifoltojar, Arash, Rajesparan, Kannan, Rahman, Farzana, Narayanan, Priya, Naaseri, Sahar, Lopes, Andre, Bainbridge, Alan, Punwani, Shonit, Hall-Craggs, Margaret A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine which of four Dixon image types [in-phase (IP), out-of-phase (OP), fat only (FO) and water-only (WO)] is most sensitive for detecting multiple myeloma (MM) focal lesions on whole body MRI (WB-MRI) images. Thirty patients with clinically-suspected MM underwent WB-MRI at 3 Tesla. Unenhanced IP, OP, FO and WO Dixon images were generated and read by four radiologists. On each image type, each radiologist identified and labelled all visible myeloma lesions in the bony pelvis. Each identified lesion was compared with a reference standard consisting of pre- and post-contrast Dixon and diffusion weighted imaging (read by a further consultant radiologist) to determine whether the lesion was truly positive. Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity, and positive predictive value were compared across the four Dixon image types. Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity and confidence scores were all significantly higher on FO images than on IP images (p>0.05). FO images are more sensitive than other Dixon image types for MM focal lesions, and should be preferentially read by radiologists to improve diagnostic accuracy and reporting efficiency.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0180562