Favipiravir pharmacokinetics in Ebola-Infected patients of the JIKI trial reveals concentrations lower than targeted

In 2014-2015, we assessed favipiravir tolerance and efficacy in patients with Ebola virus (EBOV) disease (EVD) in Guinea (JIKI trial). Because the drug had never been used before for this indication and that high concentrations of the drugs were needed to achieve antiviral efficacy against EBOV, a p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2017-02, Vol.11 (2), p.e0005389-e0005389
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Thi Huyen Tram, Guedj, Jérémie, Anglaret, Xavier, Laouénan, Cédric, Madelain, Vincent, Taburet, Anne-Marie, Baize, Sylvain, Sissoko, Daouda, Pastorino, Boris, Rodallec, Anne, Piorkowski, Géraldine, Carazo, Sara, Conde, Mamoudou N, Gala, Jean-Luc, Bore, Joseph Akoi, Carbonnelle, Caroline, Jacquot, Frédéric, Raoul, Hervé, Malvy, Denis, de Lamballerie, Xavier, Mentré, France
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In 2014-2015, we assessed favipiravir tolerance and efficacy in patients with Ebola virus (EBOV) disease (EVD) in Guinea (JIKI trial). Because the drug had never been used before for this indication and that high concentrations of the drugs were needed to achieve antiviral efficacy against EBOV, a pharmacokinetic model had been used to propose relevant dosing regimen. Here we report the favipiravir plasma concentrations that were achieved in participants in the JIKI trial and put them in perspective with the model-based targeted concentrations. Pre-dose drug concentrations were collected at Day-2 and Day-4 of treatment in 66 patients of the JIKI trial and compared to those predicted by the model taking into account patient's individual characteristics. At Day-2, the observed concentrations were slightly lower than the model predictions adjusted for patient's characteristics (median value of 46.1 versus 54.3 μg/mL for observed and predicted concentrations, respectively, p = 0.012). However, the concentrations dropped at Day-4, which was not anticipated by the model (median values of 25.9 and 64.4 μg/mL for observed and predicted concentrations, respectively, p
ISSN:1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005389