Modeling of Experimental Data Supports HIV Reactivation from Latency after Treatment Interruption on Average Once Every 5-8 Days

The correlation between growth rate and time-to-detection in cohort 3 was in fact positive (r = 0.029, p = 0.9) despite an expected negative correlation. The fourth estimate comes from Hill et al.'s own previous work[4] but is derived directly from the estimate of reference [3] (see S1 Methods)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS pathogens 2016-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e1005740-e1005740
Hauptverfasser: Pinkevych, Mykola, Kent, Stephen J, Tolstrup, Martin, Lewin, Sharon R, Cooper, David A, Søgaard, Ole S, Rasmussen, Thomas A, Kelleher, Anthony D, Cromer, Deborah, Davenport, Miles P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The correlation between growth rate and time-to-detection in cohort 3 was in fact positive (r = 0.029, p = 0.9) despite an expected negative correlation. The fourth estimate comes from Hill et al.'s own previous work[4] but is derived directly from the estimate of reference [3] (see S1 Methods). [...]the evidence for a reactivation rate of 4 per day hinges upon reference [3]'s use of a 13-parameter model of time to drug resistance, in which many of the input parameters are described as "roughly based on the literature"[3].
ISSN:1553-7374
1553-7366
1553-7374
DOI:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005740