Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

To critically review the currently available evidence of studies comparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with open radical cystectomy (ORC). A comprehensive review of the literature from Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus was performed in April 2014. All relevant studies comparing RARC wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0121032-e0121032
Hauptverfasser: Xia, Leilei, Wang, Xianjin, Xu, Tianyuan, Zhang, Xiaohua, Zhu, Zhaowei, Qin, Liang, Zhang, Xiang, Fang, Chen, Zhang, Minguang, Zhong, Shan, Shen, Zhoujun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To critically review the currently available evidence of studies comparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with open radical cystectomy (ORC). A comprehensive review of the literature from Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus was performed in April 2014. All relevant studies comparing RARC with ORC were included for further screening. A pooled meta-analysis of all comparative studies was performed and publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot. Nineteen studies were included for the analysis, including a total of 1779 patients (787 patients in the RARC group and 992 patients in the ORC group). Although RARC was associated with longer operative time (p
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0121032