Factors associated with self-reported repeat HIV testing after a negative result in Durban, South Africa

Routine screening for HIV infection leads to early detection and treatment. We examined patient characteristics associated with repeated screening in a high prevalence country. We analyzed data from a cohort of 5,229 adults presenting for rapid HIV testing in the outpatient departments of 2 South Af...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2013-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e62362-e62362
Hauptverfasser: Regan, Susan, Losina, Elena, Chetty, Senica, Giddy, Janet, Walensky, Rochelle P, Ross, Douglas, Holst, Helga, Katz, Jeffrey N, Freedberg, Kenneth A, Bassett, Ingrid V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Routine screening for HIV infection leads to early detection and treatment. We examined patient characteristics associated with repeated screening in a high prevalence country. We analyzed data from a cohort of 5,229 adults presenting for rapid HIV testing in the outpatient departments of 2 South African hospitals from November 2006 to August 2010. Patients were eligible if they were ≥18 years, reported no previous diagnosis with HIV infection, and not pregnant. Before testing, participants completed a questionnaire including gender, age, HIV testing history, health status, and knowledge about HIV and acquaintances with HIV. Enrollment HIV test results and CD4 counts were abstracted from the medical record. We present prevalence of HIV infection and median CD4 counts by HIV testing history (first-time vs. repeat). We estimated adjusted relative risks (ARR's) for repeat testing by demographics, health status, and knowledge of HIV and others with HIV in a generalized linear model. Of 4,877 participants with HIV test results available, 26% (N = 1258) were repeat testers. Repeat testers were less likely than first-time testers to be HIV-infected (34% vs. 54%, p
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0062362