Prognostic utility of biomarkers in predicting of one-year outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation

The aim of the work was to find biomarkers identifying patients at high risk of adverse clinical outcomes after TAVI and SAVR in addition to currently used predictive model (EuroSCORE). There is limited data about the role of biomarkers in predicting prognosis, especially when TAVI is available. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2012-12, Vol.7 (12), p.e48851-e48851
Hauptverfasser: Parenica, Jiri, Nemec, Petr, Tomandl, Josef, Ondrasek, Jiri, Pavkova-Goldbergova, Monika, Tretina, Martin, Jarkovsky, Jiri, Littnerova, Simona, Poloczek, Martin, Pokorny, Petr, Spinar, Jindrich, Cermakova, Zdenka, Miklik, Roman, Malik, Petr, Pes, Ondrej, Lipkova, Jolana, Tomandlova, Marie, Kala, Petr
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of the work was to find biomarkers identifying patients at high risk of adverse clinical outcomes after TAVI and SAVR in addition to currently used predictive model (EuroSCORE). There is limited data about the role of biomarkers in predicting prognosis, especially when TAVI is available. The multi-biomarker sub-study included 42 consecutive high-risk patients (average age 82.0 years; logistic EuroSCORE 21.0%) allocated to TAVI transfemoral and transapical using the Edwards-Sapien valve (n = 29), or SAVR with the Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis (n = 13). Standardized endpoints were prospectively followed during the 12-month follow-up. The clinical outcomes after both TAVI and SAVR were comparable. Malondialdehyde served as the best predictor of a combined endpoint at 1 year with AUC (ROC analysis) = 0.872 for TAVI group, resp. 0.765 (p
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0048851