Unenhanced Helical Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Flank Pain
Objective: The diagnostic value of unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of acute flank pain is investigated in a prospective study. Patients and Methods: In 125 patients aged 18–86 years, we performed unenhanced helical CT in addition to abdominal plain film, abdominal ultr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology 2001-04, Vol.39 (4), p.460-465 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: The diagnostic value of unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of acute flank pain is investigated in a prospective study. Patients and Methods: In 125 patients aged 18–86 years, we performed unenhanced helical CT in addition to abdominal plain film, abdominal ultrasound and urinalysis as a diagnostic measure for acute flank pain. Ureteral calculi were confirmed or, respectively, excluded by retrograde ureteropyelography in 80 cases. In the other cases, diagnosis was verified by clinical course and/or stone asservation. Results: In 91 of 125 patients the flank pain was caused by a ureteral calculus. In 67 of 91 patients with urolithiasis, stones could be collected for analysis. Helical CT was able to precisely identify 90 ureteral calculi. Abdominal plain films led to 8 false–positive and 48 false–negative findings. Thus, sensitivity of plain radiography, ultrasound and urinalysis was 47, 11 and 84% with a specificity 76, 97 and 32%, respectively. Conclusions: Unenhanced helical CT reaches a distinctively increased diagnostic value (sensitivity 99%, specificity 97%) in the evaluation of acute flank pain as compared to plain radiography, ultrasound and urinalysis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0302-2838 1873-7560 1421-993X |
DOI: | 10.1159/000052486 |