Projection from dorsal column nuclei to dorsal mesencephalon
L. L. Cooper and J. O. Dostrovsky This study investigated the projection from the dorsal column nuclei (DCN) to the dorsal mesencephalon. Single-unit extracellular recordings were obtained from the DCN of alpha-chloralose anesthetized cats. Neurons were identified by standard antidromic stimulation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 1985-01, Vol.53 (1), p.183-200 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | L. L. Cooper and J. O. Dostrovsky
This study investigated the projection from the dorsal column nuclei (DCN)
to the dorsal mesencephalon. Single-unit extracellular recordings were
obtained from the DCN of alpha-chloralose anesthetized cats. Neurons were
identified by standard antidromic stimulation criteria as projecting to the
dorsal mesencephalon (M neurons), the diencephalon (D neurons), or to both
regions (MD neurons). Fifty-two neurons could be antidromically activated
from the dorsal mesencephalon. Of these, 31 could also be antidromically
activated by stimulation in the diencephalon. An additional 34 neurons were
studied that could be antidromically activated only from the diencephalon.
Stimulation sites within the dorsal mesencephalon effective in
antidromically activating M and MD neurons were in the caudal ventrolateral
superior colliculus, the intercollicular area, and external nucleus of the
inferior colliculus. Effective diencephalic stimulation sites were in the
ventroposterolateral nucleus, the zona incerta, and the magnocellular
division of the medial geniculate. The antidromic latencies to stimulation
in the dorsal mesencephalon of M and MD neurons spanned a similar but wide
range of values in contrast to the latencies to stimulation in the
diencephalon of D neurons which were all short. Conduction velocities along
the mesencephalic and diencephalic collaterals of MD neurons were similar.
Many of the neurons projecting to the mesencephalon had receptive fields
located proximally on the body. Most of the neurons had rapidly adapting
responses to low-intensity mechanical stimulation of the skin. The major
difference between the mesencephalic M and MD projection neurons and
diencephalic projection D neurons was the larger percentage of neurons
having proximal receptive fields in the former group. These findings are
the first electrophysiological demonstration of a direct somatosensory
input to the dorsal mesencephalon arising in the DCN. This input is
probably responsible for providing some of the somatosensory input to the
deeper layers of the superior colliculus, the external nucleus of the
inferior colliculus, and the intercollicular area, regions known to have
neurons responding to somatosensory stimuli. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.1985.53.1.183 |