Aerosol Capture in Particle Laden Granular Beds in the Impaction Dominated Regime
The single grain capture efficiency η differs from the value η 0 for a clean bed when the number N of captured aerosol particles per grain becomes sufficiently large. The dependence of η on N was found by numerically solving population balance equations for N k where N k is the number of clusters pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aerosol science and technology 1987-01, Vol.7 (1), p.31-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The single grain capture efficiency η differs from the value η
0
for a clean bed when the number N of captured aerosol particles per grain becomes sufficiently large. The dependence of η on N was found by numerically solving population balance equations for N
k
where N
k
is the number of clusters per grain containing k primary aerosol particles. The model requires two functions of k: β
k
, the fraction of the total flow past one grain that flows past a single cluster of size k; and η
k
, the efficiency of capture from that flow. For this work we used β
k
= β
1
(1 +
)/2 and (η
k
− η
0
) = (η
1
− η
0
)
. The resulting dependence of η on N is given with reasonable accuracy by η = η
0
+ (η
1
− η
0
)β
1
N/[1 + g(β
1
N)] with g(β
1
N) = 0.13β
1
N for β
1
N < 6 and g(β
1
N) = 0.33
for β
1
N > 6. The penetration of monodisperse aerosols through initially clean granular beds was measured for sufficiently long challenge times that significant reductions in penetration occurred. Aerosol diameters D
p
ranged from 1.5 to 3.5 μm; superficial velocity U, from 0.2 to 0.6 m/s; bed depth, from 25 to 100 mm; and grain diameter, D
G
, was 1.9 mm. For these conditions, capture in clean beds is dominated by impaction. Values of β
1
(η
1
− η
0
) were determined by comparison of the measured penetration history with calculations from the model. The precision of the measurements is not sufficient to allow separate values of β
1
and (η
1
− η
0
) to be deduced. The value of β
1
can be estimated from geometrical considerations to be of the order of 2D
p
/πD
G
. Using this estimate we found (η
1
− η
0
)/η
0
to average 0.14 with a standard deviation of 0.06. The model is based on unsubstantiated expressions for β
k
and η
k
. Nevertheless, with the expressions adopted, the model does reproduce the trends observed with a suitable value for (η
1
− η
0
)/η
0
. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0278-6826 1521-7388 |
DOI: | 10.1080/02786828708959144 |