Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms
This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics control, and dynamics, 2001-03, Vol.24 (2), p.201-205 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 205 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 201 |
container_title | Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Roscoe, Kelly M |
description | This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are provided illustrating the coning-to-sculling algorithm conversion process. The results are verified by comparing them against previously derived coning and sculling algorithms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/2.4718 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_5684144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26897314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-d66a835d2afc108b80cc1f2eb800508396ff4f124da7ea0bbaee68a4065dc1853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOGzEYha2KSg20fYaRQJTNBN_G4ywh4hIJ0UXaTTfWH4-dGjmeYHtCeXscQKVlgVj5ok_f-e2D0FeCx7Qh_JiOeUvkBzQiDWM1k5LvoBFuGakbPMGf0G5KNxgTJkg7Qr_Obge3AW-Cvq9OTb4zJlTzHGHd9XehmgUTswNfXcPGLSG7PlTTPriwrCB01VwP3m8Ps5DNMoJPxyd-2UeXf6_SZ_TRlhvz5XndQz_Pz35ML-ur7xez6clVDZyxXHdCgGRNR8FqguVCYq2JpaZscIMlmwhruSWUd9AawIsFGCMkcCyaThPZsD307cm7jv3tYFJWK5e08R6C6YekWi5osbSikIdvklTIScvKr70PJLyA-6_Am36IoTxXUUaYJJhT_KLTsU8pGqvW0a0g3iuC1bYzRdW2swIePOsgafA2QtAu_aUbITnh29SjJwwcwD-JjxK17qyypZds_uSXAf9HX-U-AOFUrlE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2313810420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Roscoe, Kelly M</creator><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><description>This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are provided illustrating the coning-to-sculling algorithm conversion process. The results are verified by comparing them against previously derived coning and sculling algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-5090</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3884</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/2.4718</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JGCODS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Accelerometers ; Algorithms ; Applied sciences ; Calculations ; Compensation ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Control theory. Systems ; Exact sciences and technology ; Inertial navigation ; Integral equations ; Integrals ; Integration ; Matrix algebra ; Miscellaneous ; Numerical methods ; Sensors ; Strapdown inertial navigation ; System theory ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 2001-03, Vol.24 (2), p.201-205</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Mar/Apr 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-d66a835d2afc108b80cc1f2eb800508396ff4f124da7ea0bbaee68a4065dc1853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-d66a835d2afc108b80cc1f2eb800508396ff4f124da7ea0bbaee68a4065dc1853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5684144$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><title>Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms</title><title>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics</title><description>This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are provided illustrating the coning-to-sculling algorithm conversion process. The results are verified by comparing them against previously derived coning and sculling algorithms.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Calculations</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Control theory. Systems</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Inertial navigation</subject><subject>Integral equations</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Matrix algebra</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Numerical methods</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Strapdown inertial navigation</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0731-5090</issn><issn>1533-3884</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctOGzEYha2KSg20fYaRQJTNBN_G4ywh4hIJ0UXaTTfWH4-dGjmeYHtCeXscQKVlgVj5ok_f-e2D0FeCx7Qh_JiOeUvkBzQiDWM1k5LvoBFuGakbPMGf0G5KNxgTJkg7Qr_Obge3AW-Cvq9OTb4zJlTzHGHd9XehmgUTswNfXcPGLSG7PlTTPriwrCB01VwP3m8Ps5DNMoJPxyd-2UeXf6_SZ_TRlhvz5XndQz_Pz35ML-ur7xez6clVDZyxXHdCgGRNR8FqguVCYq2JpaZscIMlmwhruSWUd9AawIsFGCMkcCyaThPZsD307cm7jv3tYFJWK5e08R6C6YekWi5osbSikIdvklTIScvKr70PJLyA-6_Am36IoTxXUUaYJJhT_KLTsU8pGqvW0a0g3iuC1bYzRdW2swIePOsgafA2QtAu_aUbITnh29SjJwwcwD-JjxK17qyypZds_uSXAf9HX-U-AOFUrlE</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Roscoe, Kelly M</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms</title><author>Roscoe, Kelly M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-d66a835d2afc108b80cc1f2eb800508396ff4f124da7ea0bbaee68a4065dc1853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Calculations</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Control theory. Systems</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Inertial navigation</topic><topic>Integral equations</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Matrix algebra</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Numerical methods</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Strapdown inertial navigation</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roscoe, Kelly M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics</jtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>201-205</pages><issn>0731-5090</issn><eissn>1533-3884</eissn><coden>JGCODS</coden><abstract>This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are provided illustrating the coning-to-sculling algorithm conversion process. The results are verified by comparing them against previously derived coning and sculling algorithms.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/2.4718</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0731-5090 |
ispartof | Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 2001-03, Vol.24 (2), p.201-205 |
issn | 0731-5090 1533-3884 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_5684144 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acceleration Accelerometers Algorithms Applied sciences Calculations Compensation Computer science control theory systems Control theory. Systems Exact sciences and technology Inertial navigation Integral equations Integrals Integration Matrix algebra Miscellaneous Numerical methods Sensors Strapdown inertial navigation System theory Velocity |
title | Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A37%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equivalency%20Between%20Strapdown%20Inertial%20Navigation%20Coning%20and%20Sculling%20Integrals/Algorithms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20guidance,%20control,%20and%20dynamics&rft.au=Roscoe,%20Kelly%20M&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=201-205&rft.issn=0731-5090&rft.eissn=1533-3884&rft.coden=JGCODS&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/2.4718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E26897314%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2313810420&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |