Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms

This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics control, and dynamics, 2001-03, Vol.24 (2), p.201-205
1. Verfasser: Roscoe, Kelly M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 205
container_issue 2
container_start_page 201
container_title Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics
container_volume 24
creator Roscoe, Kelly M
description This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are provided illustrating the coning-to-sculling algorithm conversion process. The results are verified by comparing them against previously derived coning and sculling algorithms.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/2.4718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_5684144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26897314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-d66a835d2afc108b80cc1f2eb800508396ff4f124da7ea0bbaee68a4065dc1853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOGzEYha2KSg20fYaRQJTNBN_G4ywh4hIJ0UXaTTfWH4-dGjmeYHtCeXscQKVlgVj5ok_f-e2D0FeCx7Qh_JiOeUvkBzQiDWM1k5LvoBFuGakbPMGf0G5KNxgTJkg7Qr_Obge3AW-Cvq9OTb4zJlTzHGHd9XehmgUTswNfXcPGLSG7PlTTPriwrCB01VwP3m8Ps5DNMoJPxyd-2UeXf6_SZ_TRlhvz5XndQz_Pz35ML-ur7xez6clVDZyxXHdCgGRNR8FqguVCYq2JpaZscIMlmwhruSWUd9AawIsFGCMkcCyaThPZsD307cm7jv3tYFJWK5e08R6C6YekWi5osbSikIdvklTIScvKr70PJLyA-6_Am36IoTxXUUaYJJhT_KLTsU8pGqvW0a0g3iuC1bYzRdW2swIePOsgafA2QtAu_aUbITnh29SjJwwcwD-JjxK17qyypZds_uSXAf9HX-U-AOFUrlE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2313810420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Roscoe, Kelly M</creator><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><description>This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are provided illustrating the coning-to-sculling algorithm conversion process. The results are verified by comparing them against previously derived coning and sculling algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-5090</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3884</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/2.4718</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JGCODS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Accelerometers ; Algorithms ; Applied sciences ; Calculations ; Compensation ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Control theory. Systems ; Exact sciences and technology ; Inertial navigation ; Integral equations ; Integrals ; Integration ; Matrix algebra ; Miscellaneous ; Numerical methods ; Sensors ; Strapdown inertial navigation ; System theory ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 2001-03, Vol.24 (2), p.201-205</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Mar/Apr 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-d66a835d2afc108b80cc1f2eb800508396ff4f124da7ea0bbaee68a4065dc1853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-d66a835d2afc108b80cc1f2eb800508396ff4f124da7ea0bbaee68a4065dc1853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5684144$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><title>Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms</title><title>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics</title><description>This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are provided illustrating the coning-to-sculling algorithm conversion process. The results are verified by comparing them against previously derived coning and sculling algorithms.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Calculations</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Control theory. Systems</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Inertial navigation</subject><subject>Integral equations</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Matrix algebra</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Numerical methods</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Strapdown inertial navigation</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0731-5090</issn><issn>1533-3884</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkctOGzEYha2KSg20fYaRQJTNBN_G4ywh4hIJ0UXaTTfWH4-dGjmeYHtCeXscQKVlgVj5ok_f-e2D0FeCx7Qh_JiOeUvkBzQiDWM1k5LvoBFuGakbPMGf0G5KNxgTJkg7Qr_Obge3AW-Cvq9OTb4zJlTzHGHd9XehmgUTswNfXcPGLSG7PlTTPriwrCB01VwP3m8Ps5DNMoJPxyd-2UeXf6_SZ_TRlhvz5XndQz_Pz35ML-ur7xez6clVDZyxXHdCgGRNR8FqguVCYq2JpaZscIMlmwhruSWUd9AawIsFGCMkcCyaThPZsD307cm7jv3tYFJWK5e08R6C6YekWi5osbSikIdvklTIScvKr70PJLyA-6_Am36IoTxXUUaYJJhT_KLTsU8pGqvW0a0g3iuC1bYzRdW2swIePOsgafA2QtAu_aUbITnh29SjJwwcwD-JjxK17qyypZds_uSXAf9HX-U-AOFUrlE</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Roscoe, Kelly M</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms</title><author>Roscoe, Kelly M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-d66a835d2afc108b80cc1f2eb800508396ff4f124da7ea0bbaee68a4065dc1853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Calculations</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Control theory. Systems</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Inertial navigation</topic><topic>Integral equations</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Matrix algebra</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Numerical methods</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Strapdown inertial navigation</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roscoe, Kelly M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics</jtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>201-205</pages><issn>0731-5090</issn><eissn>1533-3884</eissn><coden>JGCODS</coden><abstract>This paper develops a generic equivalency between strapdown inertial navigation coning and sculling integrals and algorithms. The equivalency allows a previously derived coning algorithm to be converted to its corresponding sculling algorithm using a simple mathematical formula. Two examples are provided illustrating the coning-to-sculling algorithm conversion process. The results are verified by comparing them against previously derived coning and sculling algorithms.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/2.4718</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0731-5090
ispartof Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 2001-03, Vol.24 (2), p.201-205
issn 0731-5090
1533-3884
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_5684144
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acceleration
Accelerometers
Algorithms
Applied sciences
Calculations
Compensation
Computer science
control theory
systems
Control theory. Systems
Exact sciences and technology
Inertial navigation
Integral equations
Integrals
Integration
Matrix algebra
Miscellaneous
Numerical methods
Sensors
Strapdown inertial navigation
System theory
Velocity
title Equivalency Between Strapdown Inertial Navigation Coning and Sculling Integrals/Algorithms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A37%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equivalency%20Between%20Strapdown%20Inertial%20Navigation%20Coning%20and%20Sculling%20Integrals/Algorithms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20guidance,%20control,%20and%20dynamics&rft.au=Roscoe,%20Kelly%20M&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=201-205&rft.issn=0731-5090&rft.eissn=1533-3884&rft.coden=JGCODS&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/2.4718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E26897314%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2313810420&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true