A Successful Computerized Protocol for Clinical Management of Pressure Control Inverse Ratio Ventilation in ARDS Patients

We have developed a computerized protocol that provides a systematic approach for management of pressure control-inverse ratio ventilation (PCIRV). The protocols were used for 1,466 h in ten around-the-clock PCIRV evaluations on seven patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 1992-03, Vol.101 (3), p.697-710
Hauptverfasser: East, Thomas D., Böhm, Stephan H., Wallace, C. Jane, Clemmer, Terry P., Weaver, Lindell K., Orme, James F., Morris, Alan H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have developed a computerized protocol that provides a systematic approach for management of pressure control-inverse ratio ventilation (PCIRV). The protocols were used for 1,466 h in ten around-the-clock PCIRV evaluations on seven patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Patient therapy was controlled by protocol 95 percent of the time (1,396 of 1,466 h) and 90 percent of the protocol instructions (1,937 of 2,158) were followed by the clinical staff. Of the 221 protocol instructions, 88 (39 percent) not followed were due to invalid PEEPi measurements. Compared with preceding values during CPPV, the expired minute ventilation was reduced by 27 percent during PCIRV while maintaining a pH that was not clinically different (mean difference in pH = 0.02). There was no difference in the PaO2, PEEPi, or the FIO2 between PCIRV and CPPV. The PEEP setting was reduced by 33 percent from 9 ±0.05 to 6 ±0.6 and the I:E ratio increased from 0.64 ± 0.04 to 2.3 ± 0.10. Peak airway pressure was reduced by 24 percent (from 59 ± 1.5 to 45 ±0.6) and mean airway pressure increased by 27 percent (from 22 ±0.8 to 28 ±0.6) in PCIRV. Right atrial and pulmonary artery pressures were higher and cardiac output lower in PCIRV but blood pressure was unchanged. The success of this protocol has demonstrated the feasibility of using PEEPi as a primary control variable for oxygenation. This computerized PCIRV protocol should make the future use of PCIRV less mystifying, simpler, and more systematic.
ISSN:0012-3692
1931-3543
DOI:10.1378/chest.101.3.697