Comparison of the extrapulmonary β2‐adrenoceptor responses and pharmacokinetics of salbutamol given by standard metered dose‐inhaler and modified actuator device

1 Ten healthy subjects were randomised to inhale salbutamol via a standard metered‐dose inhaler (MDI), or via a modified metered‐dose actuator device (MA). Previously published radiolabelled aerosol data had shown that the MA device produced a lower aerosol velocity, reduced oropharyngeal deposition...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of clinical pharmacology 1993-11, Vol.36 (5), p.445-450
Hauptverfasser: NEWNHAM, D.M., McDEVITT, D.G., LIPWORTH, B. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:1 Ten healthy subjects were randomised to inhale salbutamol via a standard metered‐dose inhaler (MDI), or via a modified metered‐dose actuator device (MA). Previously published radiolabelled aerosol data had shown that the MA device produced a lower aerosol velocity, reduced oropharyngeal deposition, but with unchanged pulmonary deposition. 2 Dose‐response curves (DRC) were constructed with the following cumulative doses of salbutamol: 200 μg, 600 μg (200 μg + 400 μg), 1400 μg (600 μg + 800 μg) ad 2600 μg (1400 + 1200 μg). Dose increments were made every 30 min and measurements of extrapulmonary β2‐adrenoceptor responses were performed 20 min after each dose. In addition, plasma salbutamol concentrations were also measured immediately before and for up to 60 min after the last dose. 3 Baseline values were not significantly different between the two study days for any of the measured parameters. 4 Cmax (ng ml−1) for plasma salbutamol (as means and 95% CI for difference between MA and MDI) was: 2.0 (0.3–3.7), P = 0.03. Values for tmax (min), median and range: MA 5 (5–10) vs MDI 5 (5–10); and AUC 0–60, (ng ml−1 min, mean and 95% CI for difference between MA and MDI): 69 (–5–143), were not significantly different between the two devices. 5 There was a significant (P < 0.01) left shift in the DRC with the MA device compared with the MDI, for hypokalaemic, finger tremor, chronotropic and electrocardiographic (Twave, Q‐Tc) responses to salbutamol. Values for the hypokalaemic response (mmol 1−1) at 2600 μg were (as change from baseline, means and 95% CI for difference between MA and MDI): 0.23 (0.10–0.36). 6 Thus, the MA device produced greater systemic absorption of salbutamol, and associated extrapulmonary β2‐adrenoceptor responses compared with a standard MDI. These results, therefore, suggest that data from radiolabelled aerosol deposition studies may not predict the systemic absorption of inhaled β2‐adrenoceptor agonists.
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb00393.x