Monitor Turnaround Time and Time Efficiency in Hemodialysis Delivery – A Global Comparison
Background/Aims: Increasing cost pressure has forced shortening of dialysis treatments. The aim of this study was to benchmark the hemodialysis (HD) delivery monitor turnaround time and time efficiency in a global comparison. Methods: 683 HD deliveries in 26 Gambro Healthcare clinics in Europe, Taiw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Blood purification 2009, Vol.28 (3), p.234-238 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background/Aims: Increasing cost pressure has forced shortening of dialysis treatments. The aim of this study was to benchmark the hemodialysis (HD) delivery monitor turnaround time and time efficiency in a global comparison. Methods: 683 HD deliveries in 26 Gambro Healthcare clinics in Europe, Taiwan and the USA were assessed using the Treatment Mapping methodology. Results: Consolidated mean monitor turnaround time was 324.4 min. On average, 69% consisted of the HD treatment and 31% (102.8 min) of other activities: monitor preparation, monitor disinfection and monitor waiting – roughly one third each. USA had the shortest monitor turnaround, dialysis treatment and disinfection times. However, time efficiency – the percentage of monitor turnaround time on dialysis – was the lowest in the USA (68 vs. 69 and 74% in Europe and Taiwan) as monitor preparation, undress and waiting were the longest in USA. Conclusion: A monitor/disposable design to minimize time for preparation, undress and disinfection would reduce the cost of operational time without compromising quality. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0253-5068 1421-9735 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000231987 |