The Nominal Nature of Where, When, and How: Evidence from Free Relatives
We argue that the wh-words 'where', 'when', and 'how' are inherently nominal, rather than prepositional, though they are NPs with a peculiar property: they are always base-generated as the complement of a preposition (P), which is often silent. Our main evidence comes f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Linguistic inquiry 2009-01, Vol.40 (1), p.155-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We argue that the wh-words 'where', 'when', and 'how' are inherently nominal, rather than prepositional, though they are NPs with a peculiar property: they are always base-generated as the complement of a preposition (P), which is often silent. Our main evidence comes from the behavior of embedded noninterrogative wh-clauses known as free relatives (RFs). We show that this behavior can be easily accounted for if 'where', 'when', and 'how' are inherently nominal. We bring further empirical support to our proposal by extending it to wh-interrogatives and by discussing the similarities between FRs and the NPs that have been called bare-NP adverbs or adverbial NPs (Emonds 1976, 1987, Larson 1985, McCawley 1988). We also show that potential alternative accounts that make different assumptions about the nature of 'where', 'when', and 'how' are unable to account for the data. Adapted from the source document |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-3892 1530-9150 |
DOI: | 10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.155 |