Mobility and threshold-voltage comparison between [110]- and (100)-oriented ultrathin-body silicon MOSFETs
Mobility and threshold-voltage (V th ) behaviour in (110) and (100) ultrathin body (UTB) n- and p-MOSFETs are experimentally examined, and performance is compared between (110) and (100) UTB CMOSFETs based on the estimated propagation delay time. Out-of-plane effective mass (m z ) is the key paramet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on electron devices 2006-10, Vol.53 (10), p.2582-2588 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Mobility and threshold-voltage (V th ) behaviour in (110) and (100) ultrathin body (UTB) n- and p-MOSFETs are experimentally examined, and performance is compared between (110) and (100) UTB CMOSFETs based on the estimated propagation delay time. Out-of-plane effective mass (m z ) is the key parameter that causes the difference in mobility and V th behavior between (110) and (100). Large V th increase and monotonic mobility degradation, as a decrease of the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) thickness, are observed in (110) UTB nMOSFETs due to a smaller m z than (100). Mobility enhancement in (100) UTB double-gate (DG) pMOSFETs is demonstrated, which may be attributable to volume inversion. Propagation delay time is estimated based on the measured mobility, and delay is improved by 30% in (110) UTB DG CMOSFETs compared to conventional bulk CMOSFETs |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-9383 1557-9646 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TED.2006.882397 |