Mobility and threshold-voltage comparison between [110]- and (100)-oriented ultrathin-body silicon MOSFETs

Mobility and threshold-voltage (V th ) behaviour in (110) and (100) ultrathin body (UTB) n- and p-MOSFETs are experimentally examined, and performance is compared between (110) and (100) UTB CMOSFETs based on the estimated propagation delay time. Out-of-plane effective mass (m z ) is the key paramet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on electron devices 2006-10, Vol.53 (10), p.2582-2588
Hauptverfasser: Tsutsui, G., Hiramoto, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Mobility and threshold-voltage (V th ) behaviour in (110) and (100) ultrathin body (UTB) n- and p-MOSFETs are experimentally examined, and performance is compared between (110) and (100) UTB CMOSFETs based on the estimated propagation delay time. Out-of-plane effective mass (m z ) is the key parameter that causes the difference in mobility and V th behavior between (110) and (100). Large V th increase and monotonic mobility degradation, as a decrease of the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) thickness, are observed in (110) UTB nMOSFETs due to a smaller m z than (100). Mobility enhancement in (100) UTB double-gate (DG) pMOSFETs is demonstrated, which may be attributable to volume inversion. Propagation delay time is estimated based on the measured mobility, and delay is improved by 30% in (110) UTB DG CMOSFETs compared to conventional bulk CMOSFETs
ISSN:0018-9383
1557-9646
DOI:10.1109/TED.2006.882397