An experiment with association rules and classification: post-bagging and conviction
In this paper we study a new technique we call post-bagging, which consists in resampling parts of a classification model rather then the data. We do this with a particular kind of model: large sets of classification association rules, and in combination with ordinary best rule and weighted voting a...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper we study a new technique we call post-bagging, which consists in resampling parts of a classification model rather then the data. We do this with a particular kind of model: large sets of classification association rules, and in combination with ordinary best rule and weighted voting approaches. We empirically evaluate the effects of the technique in terms of classification accuracy. We also discuss the predictive power of different metrics used for association rule mining, such as confidence, lift, conviction and X². We conclude that, for the described experimental conditions, post-bagging improves classification results and that the best metric is conviction.
Programa de Financiamento Plurianual de Unidades de I & D.
Comunidade Europeia (CE). Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER).
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) - POSI/SRI/39630/2001/Class Project. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
DOI: | 10.1007/11563983_13 |