Finding Collisions on a Public Road, or Do Secure Hash Functions Need Secret Coins?
Many cryptographic primitives begin with parameter generation, which picks a primitive from a family. Such generation can use public coins (e.g., in the discrete-logarithm-based case) or secret coins (e.g., in the factoring-based case). We study the relationship between public-coin and secret-coin c...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Many cryptographic primitives begin with parameter generation, which picks a primitive from a family. Such generation can use public coins (e.g., in the discrete-logarithm-based case) or secret coins (e.g., in the factoring-based case). We study the relationship between public-coin and secret-coin collision-resistant hash function families (CRHFs). Specifically, we demonstrate that:
there is a lack of attention to the distinction between secret-coin and public-coin definitions in the literature, which has led to some problems in the case of CRHFs;in some cases, public-coin CRHFs can be built out of secret-coin CRHFs;the distinction between the two notions is meaningful, because in general secret-coin CRHFs are unlikely to imply public-coin CRHFs.
The last statement above is our main result, which states that there is no black-box reduction from public-coin CRHFs to secret-coin CRHFs. Our proof for this result, while employing oracle separations, uses a novel approach, which demonstrates that there is no black-box reduction without demonstrating that there is no relativizing reduction. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-540-28628-8_6 |