Modules in Non-commutative Logic
The question we want to investigate was expressed by Girard in [3]: “Assume that I am given a program P [a proof-net II], and that I cut it in two parts arbitrarily. I create two ... modules, linked together by their border. Can I express that my two modules are complementary [orthogonal], in other...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The question we want to investigate was expressed by Girard in [3]:
“Assume that I am given a program P [a proof-net II], and that I cut it in two parts arbitrarily. I create two ... modules, linked together by their border. Can I express that my two modules are complementary [orthogonal], in other terms that I can branch them by identification over their common border? One would like to define the type of the modules as their branching instructions; these branching instructions should be such that they authorized the restoring of the original P [the proof-net II].” |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
DOI: | 10.1007/3-540-48959-2_3 |