Disparity and geometry of the skull in Archosauria (Reptilia: Diapsida)
A metric comparison of 155 fossil and extant species in lateral view based on the proportions of three homologous units (braincase, orbit and rostrum) reveals the existence of an archosaurian skull geometry. An empirical morphospace depicting skull proportions shows that the most variable unit is th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological journal of the Linnean Society 2003-09, Vol.80 (1), p.67-88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A metric comparison of 155 fossil and extant species in lateral view based on the proportions of three homologous units (braincase, orbit and rostrum) reveals the existence of an archosaurian skull geometry. An empirical morphospace depicting skull proportions shows that the most variable unit is the rostrum. Three skull types based on rostral proportion are proposed: meso‐, longi‐ and brevirostral. These types depend, on one hand, on a direct numerical relationship between the braincase and the orbit, with a mean ratio of 1:1; never surpassing a 2:1 or 1:2 ratio limit. On the other hand, skull types show a significant negative correlation between braincase and rostrum proportions. Close relationships have been obtained between orbit and the rostrum, although with lower significance and a geometric meaning specific to each group. Skull types depend mainly on the proportional relationship between the rostrum and the braincase. Mesorostral types account for more natural occurrences within morphospace, implying a plesiomorphic condition in Archosauria. Skulls with highest longirostral values (flying forms) display a more restrictive braincase–orbit ratio relationship. Brevirostrals are limited to the smallest skull lengths, up to approximately 180 mm. 85% of brevirostral modern birds have altricial post‐hatchling development. General allometric pattern is very similar for all sampled archosaurs, although giant taxa (i.e. non‐avian theropods) display a different type of skull proportional growth, closer to isometry. Results reveal the existence of a constructional skull geometry, highlighting the importance of the deviance of the structural design from adaptive explanations on craniofacial morphology in macroevolution. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 67–88. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-4066 1095-8312 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00219.x |