Finger dexterity, skin temperature, and blood flow during auxiliary heating in the cold
Human Protection and Performance Group, Defence Research and Development Canada-Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3M 3B9 Submitted 21 January 2003 ; accepted in final form 27 April 2003 The primary purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of two forms of hand heating and to dis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied physiology (1985) 2003-08, Vol.95 (2), p.758-770 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Human Protection and Performance Group, Defence Research and Development
Canada-Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3M 3B9
Submitted 21 January 2003
; accepted in final form 27 April 2003
The primary purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness
of two forms of hand heating and to discuss specific trends that relate finger
dexterity performance to variables such as finger skin temperature
(T fing ), finger blood flow
( fing ), forearm skin temperature
(T fsk ), forearm muscle temperature (T fmus ), mean
weighted body skin temperature
( sk ), and change in body heat
content ( Hb). These variables along with rate of body heat storage, toe
skin temperature, and change in rectal temperature were measured during direct
and indirect hand heating. Direct hand heating involved the use of
electrically heated gloves to keep the fingers warm (heated gloves condition),
whereas indirect hand heating involved warming the fingers indirectly by
actively heating the torso with an electrically heated vest (heated vest
condition). Seven men (age 35.6 ± 5.6 yr) were subjected to each method
of hand heating while they sat in a chair for 3 h during exposure to -25°C
air. fing was significantly
( P < 0.05) higher during the heated vest condition compared with
the heated gloves condition (234 ± 28 and 33 ± 4 perfusion
units, respectively), despite a similar T fing (which ranged between
28 and 35°C during the 3-h exposure). Despite the difference in
fing , there was no significant
difference in finger dexterity performance. Therefore, finger dexterity can be
maintained with direct hand heating despite a low
fing . H b ,
sk , and T fmus reached a
low of -472 ± 18 kJ, 28.5 ± 0.3°C, and 29.8 ±
0.5°C, respectively, during the heated gloves condition, but the values
were not low enough to affect finger dexterity.
body heat content; heated gloves; indirect vasodilation; body temperature; torso heating
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Brajkovic, Defence
Research and Development Canada-Toronto, Human Protection and Performance
Group, 1133 Sheppard Ave., West Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3M 3B9 (E-mail:
dragan.brajkovic{at}drdc-rddc.gc.ca ). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
DOI: | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00051.2003 |