A further comment on the construct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: A response to giancola and chermack

Giancola and Chermack responded to our criticisms of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression by arguing that two existing laboratory procedures circumvent the problems raised, and they provide evidence for the validity of these procedures. We argue that Giancola and Chermack do not succeed in t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Aggression and violent behavior 2000, Vol.5 (2), p.127-136
Hauptverfasser:	Tedeschi, James T, Quigley, Brian M
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Biological and medical sciences construct validity and aggression Laboratory paradigms and human aggression Medical sciences Methodology. Experimentation Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Techniques and methods
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Giancola and Chermack responded to our criticisms of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression by arguing that two existing laboratory procedures circumvent the problems raised, and they provide evidence for the validity of these procedures. We argue that Giancola and Chermack do not succeed in their defense of existing paradigms for both conceptual and methodological reasons.
ISSN:	1359-1789 1873-6335
DOI:	10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00028-7