1742PDTrilaciclib (T) decreases myelosuppression in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy plus atezolizumab

Abstract Background Chemotherapy (chemo)-induced damage of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) causes multi-lineage myelosuppression. Current supportive therapies are lineage specific and administered after damage has occurred. T, a highly selective, reversible CDK4/6 inhibitor and first-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of oncology 2019-10, Vol.30 (Supplement_5)
Hauptverfasser: Daniel, D, Kuchava, V, Bondarenko, I, Ivashchuk, O, Spigel, D, Dasgupta, A, Reddy, S, Melkadze, T, Jaal, J, Kudaba, I, Hart, L, Matitashvili, A, Koynov, K D, Yang, Z, Wolfe, S G, Malik, R, Morris, S R, Antal, J M, Goldschmidt, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Chemotherapy (chemo)-induced damage of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) causes multi-lineage myelosuppression. Current supportive therapies are lineage specific and administered after damage has occurred. T, a highly selective, reversible CDK4/6 inhibitor and first-in-class myelopreservation agent, preserves HSPCs during chemotherapy, improving its safety and tolerability. This trial (NCT03041311) studied the benefits of T in ES-SCLC patients receiving 1L chemo + atezolizumab (A). Methods This placebo (P)-controlled, double-blind, Ph2 study randomized (1:1) chemo-naïve ES-SCLC pts with adequate organ function, ECOG 0-2, and no symptomatic brain mets, to T or P with etoposide/carboplatin/A (ECA) for four induction cycles followed by maintenance (A). Prophylactic growth factors were prohibited in cycle 1; otherwise standard supportive care was allowed. Prespecified lineage-specific endpoints assessed the effect of T on myelosuppression. Tumor response was assessed using RECIST v1.1. FACT-L and FACT-An were evaluated. Results T + ECA was well tolerated with fewer ≥ G3 AEs in T (62% overall; 50% any drug related) vs P (87%; 74%), primarily due to less heme toxicity. T improved ANC, RBC measures and SOC interventions (Table). T also delayed time to deterioration in some PRO functioning domains and anemia symptoms. T did not affect chemo efficacy as measured by ORR and PFS; OS will be presented. Table: 1742PDParameter, n [1]ECA + P N = 53ECA + T N = 54Adjusted 1-sided P- valueMean Duration (d) G4 ANC in Cycle 1[2]40
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdz264.006