601PCorrelation between p53 expression and clinical outcome in RAS/BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving later-line irinotecan-cetuximab

Abstract Background Preclinical and clinical data support that p53 might modulate the EGFR activity and as a consequence it might influence response/resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. However, the association between p53 status and clinical outcome has not been clarified yet. In our stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of oncology 2019-10, Vol.30 (Supplement_5)
Hauptverfasser: Lai, E, Schirripa, M, Puzzoni, M, Loupakis, F, Ziranu, P, Pretta, A, Giampieri, R, Mariani, S, Liscia, N, Soro, P, Pusceddu, V, Astara, G, Impera, V, Camera, S, Musio, F, Zaniboni, A, Fassan, M, Lonardi, S, Zagonel, V, Scartozzi, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Preclinical and clinical data support that p53 might modulate the EGFR activity and as a consequence it might influence response/resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. However, the association between p53 status and clinical outcome has not been clarified yet. In our study we evaluated the role of p53 expression in RAS/BRAF wild type (WT) metastatic colorectal (mCRC) patients (pts) receiving irinotecan-cetuximab by using a validation cohort. Methods p53 immunohistochemical expression was retrospectively analysed in tumour samples of RAS/BRAF WT mCRC pts treated with second-third line irinotecan-cetuximab. Our aim was to evaluate the correlation between p53 expression and OS, PFS and RR. Statistical analysis was performed with the MedCalc package. Survival distribution was assessed by the Kaplan-Meyer method and comparison of survival curves was performed with log-rank test. Results Globally 120 RAS/BRAF WT mCRC pts were included in our analysis, 88 in the exploratory cohort and 32 in the validation cohort. 36/88 and 14/32 pts had p53 normal expression, whereas 52/88 and 18/32 showed p53 overexpression. In the exploratory cohort, RR was 61.1% in pts with p53 normal expression versus (vs) 3.8% in pts overexpressing p53 (p 
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdz246.078