LBA35OVERALL SURVIVAL AND BIOMARKER RESULTS FROM A PHASE 2 STUDY OF MEK1/2 INHIBITOR BINIMETINIB (MEK162) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED NRAS-MUTANT MELANOMA
Abstract Aim: No approved therapies exist that specifically target NRAS-mutant melanoma (≈ 20% of cases). In this study of BRAF V600- or NRAS-mutant melanoma, binimetinib, a potent and selective MEK1/2 inhibitor, was the first targeted therapy to show preliminary clinical activity in NRAS-advanced m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of oncology 2014-09, Vol.25 (suppl_4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Aim: No approved therapies exist that specifically target NRAS-mutant melanoma (≈ 20% of cases). In this study of BRAF V600- or NRAS-mutant melanoma, binimetinib, a potent and selective MEK1/2 inhibitor, was the first targeted therapy to show preliminary clinical activity in NRAS-advanced melanoma (Ascierto et al. Lancet Oncol, 2013).
Methods: This is a phase 2 open-label single arm study of binimetinib 45 mg orally twice daily (bid) in patients with advanced/unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600- or NRAS-mutant melanoma. Updated efficacy, safety, and biomarker analyses of a larger NRAS-mutant subgroup than previously reported are presented here. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Genomic profiling covering a panel of 293 clinically relevant cancer genes was conducted on pretreatment biopsies.
Results: Patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma (n = 117) received binimetinib 45 mg bid. Median duration of exposure was 15.9 wks. ORR was 14.5% (1 CR, 16 PRs); disease control rate (≥SD) was 56%. Median PFS was 3.6 mos (95% CI, 2.6–3.8); median OS was 12.2 mos (Lower 95% CI, 7.9). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were dermatitis acneiform (54%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (CK, 51%), and peripheral edema (42%). The most common grade 3/4 AE was increased blood CK (25%). Reduced pERK and DUSP6 expression demonstrated MAPK pathway inhibition by binimetinib; however, there was no clear association between efficacy and reduced expression, maybe due to limited data. Genetic landscape of a subset of patients (n = 78) with corresponding efficacy will be presented. CCND1 or CCND3 amplifications were exclusively seen in 5 patients with shorter PFS (≤3.6 mos), suggesting the hypothesis that constitutive CDK4/6 pathway signaling may play a role in resistance.
Conclusions: Binimetinib 45mg bid is active in NRAS-mutant melanoma with an acceptable safety profile. A pivotal phase 3 study (NEMO) evaluating binimetinib in NRAS-mutant melanoma is ongoing. Understanding of the genetic landscape will be further refined from data collected in the NEMO study.
Disclosure: C. van Herpen: has been on a board of directors and/or advisory board for Merck and has received research funding for Novartis and Merck; A. Hauschild: has received trial grants for Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, GSK, MelaSciences, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Oncosec, Roche. He has also |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0923-7534 1569-8041 |
DOI: | 10.1093/annonc/mdu438.43 |