Near-field high resolution strain measurements prior to the October 18, 1989, Loma Prieta M sub s 1. 7 earthquake
High resolution strain recordings were made in deep boreholes throughout California prior to, during, and following, the October 18, 1989, M{sub s} 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake. The nearest dilational strainmeters (sensitivity 10{sup {minus}10}) and 3-component tensor strainmeters (sensitivity 10{sup...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 1990-09, Vol.17:10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | High resolution strain recordings were made in deep boreholes throughout California prior to, during, and following, the October 18, 1989, M{sub s} 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake. The nearest dilational strainmeters (sensitivity 10{sup {minus}10}) and 3-component tensor strainmeters (sensitivity 10{sup {minus}9}) were 37 km to 42 km, respectively, from the main shock. High quality data, including details of strain offsets, were recorded on both instruments through the earthquake. These data have been searched for indications of short-, intermediate-, and long-term strain redistribution and/or fault slip that might have indicated imminent rupture. Short- and intermediate-term changes in both tensor strain and dilational strain ({le} several nanostrain, if any) during the minutes to months before the earthquake are at least 1,000 times smaller than that generated by the earthquake itself. If short-term preseismic slip did occur at the nucleation point of the earthquake during the previous week, and if the type of slip is similar to that during the earthquake, its moment could not be more than 10{sup 24} dyne-cm. Stated another way, slip equivalent to that expected for a M 5.3 earthquake could have occurred in the hypocentral region without the strainmeters detecting it at these distances and azimuthal positions. Long-term strain changes appear to have occurred in mid-1988 and mid-1989. These changes were both followed by M{sub L} 5 earthquakes in the hypocentral region on June 27, 1988, and August 8, 1989, respectively, and, since they correspond approximately to changes in geodetic strain rate over the epicenter, may indicate precursory strain redistribution in the epicentral region. Minor post-seismic strain recovery ({approx} 14%) occurred in the month following the main shock. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1029/GL017i010p01777 |