Superfund and groundwater remediation:Another perspective

A previous paper by Travis and Doty had made 6 policy recommendations for groundwater remediation at Superfund sites. These were: early action; reduction of contaminant mass and the containment of plumes of pollution; emphasis on control of contaminants at sites; priority to aquifers of high quality...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 1991-03, Vol.25 (3), p.370-371
1. Verfasser: Rowe, Jr, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A previous paper by Travis and Doty had made 6 policy recommendations for groundwater remediation at Superfund sites. These were: early action; reduction of contaminant mass and the containment of plumes of pollution; emphasis on control of contaminants at sites; priority to aquifers of high quality and use; admission that aquifer restoration was unachievable; and the abandonment of chemical specific clean-up goals. In fact, the first 4 recommendations were either explicit or implied in Superfund policy, as demonstrated by several decisions. The last 2 were unacceptable because they would cause the abandonment of reasonable regulatory goals and reduce the incentive to improve remediation techniques. Where total clean-up proved impossible, a waiver could be granted to regularize the position and avoid excessive expenditure.
ISSN:0013-936X
1520-5851
DOI:10.1021/es00015a600