Cell Cycle Progression Delay in Conditioned Medium Does Not Play a Role in the Repair of X-Ray Damage in Chinese Hamster V79 Cells

We tested our hypothesis that the lower survival of X-irradiated cells in growth medium (GM) relative to that in conditioned medium (CM) is due to differences in nutrient concentration levels rather than to differential effects on cell progression and growth. Chinese hamster V79 cells in log and unfed plateau phase, grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium (MEM) with 15% serum (100% GM), were irradiated. Before plating, cells were incubated in situ in various concentrations of MEM with serum (GM, normal cell progression) or MEM without serum or in CM (no cell progression). Cell survival was the lowest in 100% MEM with or without serum and increased with the decrease in MEM and serum concentrations, reaching a plateau in 40% MEM or 40% growth medium (40% MEM with 6% serum), similar to that in conditioned medium. Growth kinetics was the same in 40 and 100% growth medium, but the D0of cells in 40% growth medium was higher than that of cells in 100% GM. Similarly, the D0of cells in 40% MEM was higher than that of cells in 100% MEM, although cell progression was absent in both media. The radiation sensitivity of cells was the same in 40% GM with progression and in 40% MEM and CM with no progression. Cells in low-nutrient media were flatter than those in 100% MEM or GM. There was a correlation between the nutrient concentration in the medium postirradiation and the D0. This correlation was independent of the presence or absence of serum and thus independent of cell cycle progression. The cell morphology which is dependent on the nutrient concentration appears to influence the ability of a fraction of cells to repair their radiation damage.