International fuel performance study of fresh fuel experiments for PCMI effects during RIA experiments
•International modeling and simulation exercise for LWR fuel behavior during RIA.•Computational prediction of representative fuel testings in TREAT and NSRR.•Thermal-mechanical analysis of LWR fuel rod under different irradiation conditions.•Sensitivity study on LWR fuel rod under different RIA tran...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear engineering and design 2024-12, Vol.430 (C), p.113673, Article 113673 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •International modeling and simulation exercise for LWR fuel behavior during RIA.•Computational prediction of representative fuel testings in TREAT and NSRR.•Thermal-mechanical analysis of LWR fuel rod under different irradiation conditions.•Sensitivity study on LWR fuel rod under different RIA transient conditions.
This paper presents the results of High-burnup Experiments for Reactivity-initiated Accident (HERA) Modeling & Simulation (M&S) exercise. The HERA project under the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Second Framework for Irradiation Experiments (FIDES-II) program is focused on studying Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel behavior during Reactivity-Initiated Accident (RIA) conditions. The Part I M&S cases are based on a series of tests in the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility in the United States and the Nuclear Safety Research Reactor (NSRR) in Japan. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the test design to accomplish its goals in establishing clearer understanding of the effects of power pulse width during RIA conditions. The blind predictions using various computational tools have been performed and compared amongst to interpret the behaviors of high burnup fuels during RIA. While many international participants evaluate the thermal–mechanical behavior of fuel rod under different conditions, a considerable scatter of outputs comes out for the cases due to the disparity between codes in predicting mechanical behaviors. In general, however, the results of thermal–mechanical analysis elaborate that nominal design conditions the shorter pulse width tests in NSRR should cause cladding failures while the TREAT tests appear to have more split prediction of failure or not. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis varying key testing parameters reveals the considerable effect of power pulse width and total energy deposition on prediction of fuel rod failure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0029-5493 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113673 |