Effect of lattice orientation on compressive properties of selective laser sintered nylon lattice coupons

As AM lattices become more popular in medical devices, it is important to consider how lattice design parameters affect the mechanical integrity and performance of a device. This research investigated the effect of lattice orientation on the compressive mechanical response of five common lattice geo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mechanics of materials 2023-08, Vol.183 (C), p.104686, Article 104686
Hauptverfasser: Snodderly, Kirstie, Cunningham, Andrew, Zipin, Noah, Sung, Myung Kyun, Di Prima, Matthew, Porter, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:As AM lattices become more popular in medical devices, it is important to consider how lattice design parameters affect the mechanical integrity and performance of a device. This research investigated the effect of lattice orientation on the compressive mechanical response of five common lattice geometries: Hexagonal Honeycomb (Hex), Diamond, Voronoi Tessellation Method (VTM), sheet-based Gyroid, and Face-Centered-Cubic (FCC). Samples were tested at two relative densities and eight orientations, printed in Nylon 12 (PA2200) on an EOS P396. The mechanical response was compared to simulated finite element analysis (FEA) response for Hex and FCC lattices. Hex lattices displayed significant orientation dependance. Diamond lattices demonstrated some orientation dependance when at a lower relative density. Gyroid, FCC, and VTM all displayed minimal orientation dependance. Increasing lattice relative density appeared to reduce anisotropy among tested orientations of all lattice geometries except Hex. FEA simulations were able to produce a trend response that matched the mechanical response trends based on the investigated orientations. These results support the need for multi axial lattice mechanical test considerations. It also bolsters the need for lattice FEA models to have a sufficient comparator when identifying “worst-case” lattice test scenarios. •AM lattice orientation may have a significant effect on structural mechanical properties.•AM lattice types may exhibit minimal anisotropy and may be more favorable in complex multi-axial loading situations.•FEA may have the capability of estimating performance trends allowing for identification of worst-case lattice orientations.•The degree of AM lattice mechanical response anisotropy may be dependent on relative density.
ISSN:0167-6636
1872-7743
DOI:10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104686