Energy availability and leaf area dominate control of ecosystem evapotranspiration in the southeastern U.S
•Constructed a 162 site-years eddy flux evapotranspiration (ET) database.•Energy availability and leaf area index control monthly ET but not water availability.•Practical ET models are developed for regional applications.•Vegetation management can be effective to mitigate hydrologic impacts. Evapotr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agricultural and forest meteorology 2024-04, Vol.349 (C), p.109960, Article 109960 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Constructed a 162 site-years eddy flux evapotranspiration (ET) database.•Energy availability and leaf area index control monthly ET but not water availability.•Practical ET models are developed for regional applications.•Vegetation management can be effective to mitigate hydrologic impacts.
Evapotranspiration (ET) links water, energy, and carbon balances, and its magnitude and patterns are changing due to climate and land use change in the southeastern U.S. Quantifying the environmental controls on ET is essential for developing reliable ecohydrological models for water resources management. Here, we synthesized eddy covariance data from 24 AmeriFlux sites distributed across the southeastern U.S., comprising 162 site-years of flux data representing six representative ecosystems including cropland vegetation mosaic (CVM), deciduous broadleaf forests (DBF), evergreen needle-leaf forests (ENF), grasslands (GRA), savannas (SAV), and wetlands (WET). Our objectives were to assess the daily, seasonal, and annual variability in ET and to develop practical predictive models for regional applications in ecosystem service analysis. We evaluated the response of ET to climatic and biotic forcings including potential evapotranspiration (PET), precipitation (P), and leaf area index (LAI), and compared the performance of these empirical ET models based and those developed using machine learning algorithms. Our results showed that the mean daily ET varied significantly, ranging from 1.36 mm d−1 in GRA to 2.30 mm d−1 in SAV, with a numerical order : GRA < DBF < ENF < WET < CVM < SAV. In this humid region, mean annual PET exceeded P in 16 out of the 24 flux sites. Using the Budyko framework, we showed that ENF had the highest evaporative efficiency (ET/P). PET and leaf area index (LAI) emerged as the most influential factors explaining ET variability. Artificial neural networks (ANN) and random forest (RF) models demonstrated superior capabilities in predicting monthly ET across sites over generalized additive modeling (GAM) and multiple linear regression (MLR) methods. The present study confirmed that the Southeast region is generally 'energy limited', implying that atmospheric demand along with vegetation information can be used to reliably estimate monthly and annual ET. Our study provides valuable insights into how ET of specific ecosystems is controlled by climatic and land surface drivers, enabling the development of reliable predictive models for regional extrapolati |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0168-1923 1873-2240 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.109960 |