Completion Lymph Node Dissection or Radiation Therapy for Sentinel Node Metastasis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Background For sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), the benefit of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) versus radiation therapy (RT) is unclear. This study compares outcomes for patients with SLN metastasis undergoing CLND or RT. We also evaluated positive non-S...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2019-02, Vol.26 (2), p.386-394 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
For sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), the benefit of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) versus radiation therapy (RT) is unclear. This study compares outcomes for patients with SLN metastasis undergoing CLND or RT. We also evaluated positive non-SLNs as a prognostic factor.
Methods
Using a prospective database, we identified MCC patients with SLN metastasis who underwent CLND or RT. At our institution, CLND was recommended for patients with acceptable perioperative risk, while therapeutic RT was offered to those with high perioperative risk. Primary outcomes were MCC-specific survival (MCCSS), disease-free survival (DFS), nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS), and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS).
Results
From 2006 to 2017, 163 patients underwent CLND (
n
= 137) or RT (
n
= 26). Median follow-up was 1.9 years. CLND had no significant differences for MCCSS (5-year survival 71% vs. 64%,
p
= 1.0), DFS (52% vs. 61%,
p
= 0.8), NRFS (76% vs. 91%,
p
= 0.3), or DRFS (65% vs. 75%,
p
= 0.3) compared with RT. Patients with positive non-SLNs (
n
= 44) had significantly worse MCCSS (5-year survival 39% vs. 87%,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-018-7072-7 |