Clinical Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Analysis of 884 Patients at Facilities Specializing in Pancreatic Surgery

Background The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (NACRT), for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) has not been elucidated. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of NAC and NACRT for patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2019-06, Vol.26 (6), p.1629-1636
Hauptverfasser: Nagakawa, Yuichi, Sahara, Yatsuka, Hosokawa, Yuichi, Murakami, Yoshiaki, Yamaue, Hiroki, Satoi, Sohei, Unno, Michiaki, Isaji, Shuji, Endo, Itaru, Sho, Masayuki, Fujii, Tsutomu, Takishita, Chie, Hijikata, Yosuke, Suzuki, Shuji, Kawachi, Shigeyuki, Katsumata, Kenji, Ohta, Tetsuo, Nagakawa, Takukazu, Tsuchida, Akihiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (NACRT), for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) has not been elucidated. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of NAC and NACRT for patients with BRPC. Methods The study analyzed the treatment outcomes of 884 patients treated for BRPC from 2011 to 2013. Treatment results were compared between upfront surgery and NAT and between NAC and NACRT using propensity score-matching analysis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated via intention-to-treat analyses. Results The overall resection rates for the patients who underwent NAT were significantly lower than for the patients who underwent upfront surgery (75.1% vs 93.3%; p  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-018-07131-8