CONTRASTING GALAXY FORMATION FROM QUANTUM WAVE DARK MATTER, ψDM, WITH ΛCDM, USING PLANCK AND HUBBLE DATA

The newly established luminosity functions (LFs) of high- z galaxies at 4 ≲  z  ≲ 10 can provide a stringent check on dark matter models that aim to explain the core properties of dwarf galaxies. The cores of dwarf spheroidal galaxies are understood to be too large to be accounted for by free stream...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2016-02, Vol.818 (1), p.89
Hauptverfasser: Schive, Hsi-Yu, Chiueh, Tzihong, Broadhurst, Tom, Huang, Kuan-Wei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The newly established luminosity functions (LFs) of high- z galaxies at 4 ≲  z  ≲ 10 can provide a stringent check on dark matter models that aim to explain the core properties of dwarf galaxies. The cores of dwarf spheroidal galaxies are understood to be too large to be accounted for by free streaming of warm dark matter without overly suppressing the formation of such galaxies. Here we demonstrate with cosmological simulations that wave dark matter, , appropriate for light bosons such as axions, does not suffer from this problem, given a boson mass of (2 σ ). In this case, the halo mass function is suppressed below at a level that is consistent with the high- z LFs, while simultaneously generating the kiloparsec-scale cores in dwarf galaxies arising from the solitonic ground state in . We demonstrate that the reionization history in this scenario is consistent with the Thomson optical depth recently reported by Planck , assuming a reasonable ionizing photon production rate. We predict that the LF should turn over slowly around an intrinsic ultraviolet luminosity of at . We also show that for galaxies magnified in the Hubble Frontier Fields, predicts an order of magnitude fewer detections than cold dark matter at down to , allowing us to distinguish between these very different interpretations for the observed coldness of dark matter.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/89