SU‐E‐T‐383: Evaluation of Deep Inspiration Breath‐Hold Technique for Post‐Mastectomy Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Therapy

Purpose: Deep inspiration breath‐hold techniques (DIBH) have been shown to carry significant dosimetric advantages in conventional radiotherapy of left‐sided breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of DIBH techniques for post‐mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) using proton p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part18), p.3421-3422
Hauptverfasser: Depauw, N, Patel, S, MacDonald, S, Lu, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Deep inspiration breath‐hold techniques (DIBH) have been shown to carry significant dosimetric advantages in conventional radiotherapy of left‐sided breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of DIBH techniques for post‐mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) using proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). Method: Ten PMRT patients, with or without breast implant, underwent two helical CT scans: one with free breathing and the other with deep inspiration breath‐hold. A prescription of 50.4 Gy(RBE) to the whole chest wall and lymphatics (axillary, supraclavicular, and intramammary nodes) was considered. PBS plans were generated for each patient's CT scan using Astroid, an in‐house treatment planning system, with the institution conventional clinical PMRT parameters; that is, using a single en‐face field with a spot size varying from 8 mm to 14 mm as a function of energy. Similar optimization parameters were used in both plans in order to ensure appropriate comparison. Results: Regardless of the technique (free breathing or DIBH), the generated plans were well within clinical acceptability. DIBH allowed for higher target coverage with better sparing of the cardiac structures. The lung doses were also slightly improved. While the use of DIBH techniques might be of interest, it is technically challenging as it would require a fast PBS delivery, as well as the synchronization of the beam delivery with a gating system, both of which are not currently available at the institution. Conclusion: DIBH techniques display some dosimetric advantages over free breathing treatment for PBS PMRT patients, which warrants further investigation. Plans will also be generated with smaller spot sizes (2.5 mm to 5.5 mm and 5 mm to 9 mm), corresponding to new generation machines, in order to further quantify the dosimetric advantages of DIBH as a function of spot size.
ISSN:0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI:10.1118/1.4924744