Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3}-Bi{sub 2}O{sub 3}-B{sub 2}O{sub 3} glasses as lithium-free nonsilicate pH responsive glasses – Compatibility between pH responsivity and hydrophobicity

Highlights: • Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3}-rich FeBiB glasses show high pH sensitivity and short pH response time. • Bi{sub 2}O{sub 3}-rich FeBiB glasses show relatively high contact angle for water. • FeBiB glasses are lithium-free nonsilicate pH responsive ones. • pH responsivity and hydrophobicity are obtained for optimum glass compositions. - Abstract: Lithium silicate-based glasses have widely been used as commercially available pH glass electrodes. It was revealed that Ti{sup 3+}-containing titanophosphate (TiO{sub 2}-P{sub 2}O{sub 5}, TP) glasses are pH responsive as lithium-free nonsilicate glasses for the first time. TP glasses with the compatibility between pH responsivity and self-cleaning property were obtained by the sequential post-annealing (oxidation and reduction) of as-prepared glasses. Bi{sub 2}O{sub 3}-B{sub 2}O{sub 3} (BiB) glasses are relatively hydrophobic and are expected to show anti-fouling effect. They are unsuitable for pH responsive glasses, because they have high electrical resistivity. In the present study, xFe{sub 2}O{sub 3}·yBi{sub 2}O{sub 3}·(100 − x − y)B{sub 2}O{sub 3} glasses (xFeyBiB, x = 0–20 mol%, y = 20–80 mol%) glasses were selected as new pH responsive glasses with hydrophobicity, because Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3} is a representative component for causing hopping conduction to the glasses. BiB glass did not show pH responsivity, whereas xFeyBiB glasses showed good pH responsivity. xFeyBiB glasses are lithium-free nonsilicate pH responsive ones as well as TP glasses. The electrical resistivity and pH response time decreased with increasing Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3} content. The pH repeatability for standard solutions increased with increasing Bi{sub 2}O{sub 3} content. Silicate glass (20Fe70BiSi) showed better pH responsivity but lower contact angle than those of borate glass (20Fe70BiB). pH sensitivity increased in order of TP glasses (about 80%), xFeyBiB glasses (about 90%) and commercial pH responsive glass (about 100%). xFeyBiB glasses showed short pH response time compared to commercial pH responsive glass. The contact angle for water of xFeyBiB glasses was relatively high (about 90°) as well as BiB glasses, and increased slightly with increasing Bi{sub 2}O{sub 3} content regardless Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3} content. The high contact angle was related to low OH content determined by FT-IR measurement. Thus, 20Fe{sub 2}O{sub 3}·70Bi{sub 2}O{sub 3}·10B{sub 2}O{sub 3} glass was the most suitable one as pH responsive glasses with hydrophobicity. TP