Radiative polarization of electrons in a strong laser wave

We reanalyze the problem of radiative polarization of electrons brought into collision with a circularly polarized strong plane wave. We present an independent analytical verification of formulas for the cross section given by Ivanov et al.[Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 127 (2004)]. By choosing the exact elec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics Atomic, molecular, and optical physics, 2011-12, Vol.84 (6), Article 062116
1. Verfasser: Karlovets, Dmitry V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We reanalyze the problem of radiative polarization of electrons brought into collision with a circularly polarized strong plane wave. We present an independent analytical verification of formulas for the cross section given by Ivanov et al.[Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 127 (2004)]. By choosing the exact electron's helicity as the spin quantum number we show that the self-polarization effect exists only for the moderately relativistic electrons with energy {gamma}=E/mc{sup 2} < or approx. 10 and only for a non-head-on collision geometry. In these conditions polarization degree may achieve values up to 65%, but the effective polarization time is found to be larger than 1 s even for a high-power optical or infrared laser with intensity parameter {xi}=|E|mc{sup 2}/E{sub c}({Dirac_h}/2{pi}){omega}{approx}0.1 (E{sub c}=m{sup 2}c{sup 3}/e({Dirac_h}/2{pi})). This makes such a polarization practically unrealizable. We also compare these results with the ones of some papers where the high degree of polarization was predicted for ultrarelativistic case. We argue that this apparent contradiction arises due to the different choice of the spin quantum numbers. In particular, the quantum numbers that provide the high degree of polarization represent neither helicity nor transverse polarization, which makes the use of them inconvenient in practice.
ISSN:1050-2947
1094-1622
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062116