Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system
► We compare the environmental sustainability of two MSW collection systems. ► We evaluate pneumatic and door-to-door collection systems. ► The greenhouse gas emissions of pneumatic collection are around three times higher. ► System components are decisive but assumptions on electricity use are also...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management (Elmsford) 2012-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1775-1781 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1781 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1775 |
container_title | Waste management (Elmsford) |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Punkkinen, Henna Merta, Elina Teerioja, Nea Moliis, Katja Kuvaja, Eveliina |
description | ► We compare the environmental sustainability of two MSW collection systems. ► We evaluate pneumatic and door-to-door collection systems. ► The greenhouse gas emissions of pneumatic collection are around three times higher. ► System components are decisive but assumptions on electricity use are also important. ► Pneumatic collection could provide other benefits over door-to-door system.
Waste collection is one of the life cycle phases that influence the environmental sustainability of waste management. Pneumatic waste collection systems represent a new way of arranging waste collection in densely populated urban areas. However, limited information is available on the environmental impacts of this system. In this study, we compare the environmental sustainability of conventional door-to-door waste collection with its hypothetical pneumatic alternative. Furthermore, we analyse whether the size of the hypothetical pneumatic system, or the number of waste fractions included, have an impact on the results. Environmental loads are calculated for a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system modelled on an existing dense urban area in Helsinki, Finland, and the results are compared to those of the prevailing, container-based, door-to-door waste collection system. The evaluation method used is the life-cycle inventory (LCI). In this study, we report the atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), SO2 and NOx. The results indicate that replacing the prevailing system with stationary pneumatic waste collection in an existing urban infrastructure would increase total air emissions. Locally, in the waste collection area, emissions would nonetheless diminish, as collection traffic decreases. While the electricity consumption of the hypothetical pneumatic system and the origin of electricity have a significant bearing on the results, emissions due to manufacturing the system’s components prove decisive. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22086556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X12001936</els_id><sourcerecordid>1039887158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-db36e38566c6663808d0ac12798fa2fbd2565e1d4475a05212ef0df67c36b8a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMoznP0H4gURHDTepM0aboRZBhHYcCNgruQJikvjzapSTry_r0pfepuVjck38k99x6EXmNoMGD-4dT8VmlWviGASQOsAaBP0AGLrq9Jy_hTdICe8RoY_XmFXqR0AsCtwPAcXRHC244BOaD11j-4GPxsfVZTldaUlfNqcJPL50qHeVHRpeCrMFaqOp6XkI82O13Yxdt1VuVcFSPZFniarM6uwOlcLuZKeVNEJoRY51Bv9fLyEj0b1ZTsq0u9Rj8-336_-VLff7v7evPpvtYtgVybgXJLBeNcc86pAGFAaUy6XoyKjIMhjDOLTVuGUcAIJnYEM_JOUz4IReg1erv_G1J2MmmXrT7q4H3xKQkBwRnjhXq_U0sMv1abspxd0naalLdhTRID7YXoMBMFbXdUx5BStKNcoptVPBdIbrHIk9xjkVssEpgssRTZm0uHdZit-Sf6m0MB3l0Alcpux6i8duk_x1ugnPSF-7hztmztwdm4DWW9tsbFbSYT3ONO_gBteq7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039887158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Punkkinen, Henna ; Merta, Elina ; Teerioja, Nea ; Moliis, Katja ; Kuvaja, Eveliina</creator><creatorcontrib>Punkkinen, Henna ; Merta, Elina ; Teerioja, Nea ; Moliis, Katja ; Kuvaja, Eveliina</creatorcontrib><description>► We compare the environmental sustainability of two MSW collection systems. ► We evaluate pneumatic and door-to-door collection systems. ► The greenhouse gas emissions of pneumatic collection are around three times higher. ► System components are decisive but assumptions on electricity use are also important. ► Pneumatic collection could provide other benefits over door-to-door system.
Waste collection is one of the life cycle phases that influence the environmental sustainability of waste management. Pneumatic waste collection systems represent a new way of arranging waste collection in densely populated urban areas. However, limited information is available on the environmental impacts of this system. In this study, we compare the environmental sustainability of conventional door-to-door waste collection with its hypothetical pneumatic alternative. Furthermore, we analyse whether the size of the hypothetical pneumatic system, or the number of waste fractions included, have an impact on the results. Environmental loads are calculated for a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system modelled on an existing dense urban area in Helsinki, Finland, and the results are compared to those of the prevailing, container-based, door-to-door waste collection system. The evaluation method used is the life-cycle inventory (LCI). In this study, we report the atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), SO2 and NOx. The results indicate that replacing the prevailing system with stationary pneumatic waste collection in an existing urban infrastructure would increase total air emissions. Locally, in the waste collection area, emissions would nonetheless diminish, as collection traffic decreases. While the electricity consumption of the hypothetical pneumatic system and the origin of electricity have a significant bearing on the results, emissions due to manufacturing the system’s components prove decisive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22647502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>AIR POLLUTION ; Applied sciences ; Built urban environment ; Cities ; CONTAINERS ; Environment ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Environmental sustainability ; Exact sciences and technology ; FINLAND ; General treatment and storage processes ; GREENHOUSE GASES ; Humans ; INVENTORIES ; LIFE CYCLE ; Life-cycle inventory ; MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES ; MUNICIPAL WASTES ; NITROGEN OXIDES ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; Pneumatic system ; PNEUMATIC TRANSPORT ; Pollution ; SULFUR DIOXIDE ; URBAN AREAS ; Waste collection ; WASTE MANAGEMENT ; Waste Management - economics ; Waste Management - methods ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2012-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1775-1781</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-db36e38566c6663808d0ac12798fa2fbd2565e1d4475a05212ef0df67c36b8a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-db36e38566c6663808d0ac12798fa2fbd2565e1d4475a05212ef0df67c36b8a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X12001936$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26403629$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22086556$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Punkkinen, Henna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merta, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teerioja, Nea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moliis, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuvaja, Eveliina</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>► We compare the environmental sustainability of two MSW collection systems. ► We evaluate pneumatic and door-to-door collection systems. ► The greenhouse gas emissions of pneumatic collection are around three times higher. ► System components are decisive but assumptions on electricity use are also important. ► Pneumatic collection could provide other benefits over door-to-door system.
Waste collection is one of the life cycle phases that influence the environmental sustainability of waste management. Pneumatic waste collection systems represent a new way of arranging waste collection in densely populated urban areas. However, limited information is available on the environmental impacts of this system. In this study, we compare the environmental sustainability of conventional door-to-door waste collection with its hypothetical pneumatic alternative. Furthermore, we analyse whether the size of the hypothetical pneumatic system, or the number of waste fractions included, have an impact on the results. Environmental loads are calculated for a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system modelled on an existing dense urban area in Helsinki, Finland, and the results are compared to those of the prevailing, container-based, door-to-door waste collection system. The evaluation method used is the life-cycle inventory (LCI). In this study, we report the atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), SO2 and NOx. The results indicate that replacing the prevailing system with stationary pneumatic waste collection in an existing urban infrastructure would increase total air emissions. Locally, in the waste collection area, emissions would nonetheless diminish, as collection traffic decreases. While the electricity consumption of the hypothetical pneumatic system and the origin of electricity have a significant bearing on the results, emissions due to manufacturing the system’s components prove decisive.</description><subject>AIR POLLUTION</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Built urban environment</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>CONTAINERS</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Environmental sustainability</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FINLAND</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>GREENHOUSE GASES</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>INVENTORIES</subject><subject>LIFE CYCLE</subject><subject>Life-cycle inventory</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</subject><subject>MUNICIPAL WASTES</subject><subject>NITROGEN OXIDES</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>Pneumatic system</subject><subject>PNEUMATIC TRANSPORT</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>SULFUR DIOXIDE</subject><subject>URBAN AREAS</subject><subject>Waste collection</subject><subject>WASTE MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Waste Management - economics</subject><subject>Waste Management - methods</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMoznP0H4gURHDTepM0aboRZBhHYcCNgruQJikvjzapSTry_r0pfepuVjck38k99x6EXmNoMGD-4dT8VmlWviGASQOsAaBP0AGLrq9Jy_hTdICe8RoY_XmFXqR0AsCtwPAcXRHC244BOaD11j-4GPxsfVZTldaUlfNqcJPL50qHeVHRpeCrMFaqOp6XkI82O13Yxdt1VuVcFSPZFniarM6uwOlcLuZKeVNEJoRY51Bv9fLyEj0b1ZTsq0u9Rj8-336_-VLff7v7evPpvtYtgVybgXJLBeNcc86pAGFAaUy6XoyKjIMhjDOLTVuGUcAIJnYEM_JOUz4IReg1erv_G1J2MmmXrT7q4H3xKQkBwRnjhXq_U0sMv1abspxd0naalLdhTRID7YXoMBMFbXdUx5BStKNcoptVPBdIbrHIk9xjkVssEpgssRTZm0uHdZit-Sf6m0MB3l0Alcpux6i8duk_x1ugnPSF-7hztmztwdm4DWW9tsbFbSYT3ONO_gBteq7M</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Punkkinen, Henna</creator><creator>Merta, Elina</creator><creator>Teerioja, Nea</creator><creator>Moliis, Katja</creator><creator>Kuvaja, Eveliina</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system</title><author>Punkkinen, Henna ; Merta, Elina ; Teerioja, Nea ; Moliis, Katja ; Kuvaja, Eveliina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-db36e38566c6663808d0ac12798fa2fbd2565e1d4475a05212ef0df67c36b8a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>AIR POLLUTION</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Built urban environment</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>CONTAINERS</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Environmental sustainability</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FINLAND</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>GREENHOUSE GASES</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>INVENTORIES</topic><topic>LIFE CYCLE</topic><topic>Life-cycle inventory</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</topic><topic>MUNICIPAL WASTES</topic><topic>NITROGEN OXIDES</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>Pneumatic system</topic><topic>PNEUMATIC TRANSPORT</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>SULFUR DIOXIDE</topic><topic>URBAN AREAS</topic><topic>Waste collection</topic><topic>WASTE MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Waste Management - economics</topic><topic>Waste Management - methods</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Punkkinen, Henna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merta, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teerioja, Nea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moliis, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuvaja, Eveliina</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Punkkinen, Henna</au><au>Merta, Elina</au><au>Teerioja, Nea</au><au>Moliis, Katja</au><au>Kuvaja, Eveliina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1775</spage><epage>1781</epage><pages>1775-1781</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>► We compare the environmental sustainability of two MSW collection systems. ► We evaluate pneumatic and door-to-door collection systems. ► The greenhouse gas emissions of pneumatic collection are around three times higher. ► System components are decisive but assumptions on electricity use are also important. ► Pneumatic collection could provide other benefits over door-to-door system.
Waste collection is one of the life cycle phases that influence the environmental sustainability of waste management. Pneumatic waste collection systems represent a new way of arranging waste collection in densely populated urban areas. However, limited information is available on the environmental impacts of this system. In this study, we compare the environmental sustainability of conventional door-to-door waste collection with its hypothetical pneumatic alternative. Furthermore, we analyse whether the size of the hypothetical pneumatic system, or the number of waste fractions included, have an impact on the results. Environmental loads are calculated for a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system modelled on an existing dense urban area in Helsinki, Finland, and the results are compared to those of the prevailing, container-based, door-to-door waste collection system. The evaluation method used is the life-cycle inventory (LCI). In this study, we report the atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), SO2 and NOx. The results indicate that replacing the prevailing system with stationary pneumatic waste collection in an existing urban infrastructure would increase total air emissions. Locally, in the waste collection area, emissions would nonetheless diminish, as collection traffic decreases. While the electricity consumption of the hypothetical pneumatic system and the origin of electricity have a significant bearing on the results, emissions due to manufacturing the system’s components prove decisive.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22647502</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-053X |
ispartof | Waste management (Elmsford), 2012-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1775-1781 |
issn | 0956-053X 1879-2456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22086556 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | AIR POLLUTION Applied sciences Built urban environment Cities CONTAINERS Environment ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental sustainability Exact sciences and technology FINLAND General treatment and storage processes GREENHOUSE GASES Humans INVENTORIES LIFE CYCLE Life-cycle inventory MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES MUNICIPAL WASTES NITROGEN OXIDES Other wastes and particular components of wastes Pneumatic system PNEUMATIC TRANSPORT Pollution SULFUR DIOXIDE URBAN AREAS Waste collection WASTE MANAGEMENT Waste Management - economics Waste Management - methods Wastes |
title | Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A19%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20sustainability%20comparison%20of%20a%20hypothetical%20pneumatic%20waste%20collection%20system%20and%20a%20door-to-door%20system&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Punkkinen,%20Henna&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1775&rft.epage=1781&rft.pages=1775-1781&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1039887158%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039887158&rft_id=info:pmid/22647502&rft_els_id=S0956053X12001936&rfr_iscdi=true |