Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system

► We compare the environmental sustainability of two MSW collection systems. ► We evaluate pneumatic and door-to-door collection systems. ► The greenhouse gas emissions of pneumatic collection are around three times higher. ► System components are decisive but assumptions on electricity use are also...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2012-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1775-1781
Hauptverfasser: Punkkinen, Henna, Merta, Elina, Teerioja, Nea, Moliis, Katja, Kuvaja, Eveliina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► We compare the environmental sustainability of two MSW collection systems. ► We evaluate pneumatic and door-to-door collection systems. ► The greenhouse gas emissions of pneumatic collection are around three times higher. ► System components are decisive but assumptions on electricity use are also important. ► Pneumatic collection could provide other benefits over door-to-door system. Waste collection is one of the life cycle phases that influence the environmental sustainability of waste management. Pneumatic waste collection systems represent a new way of arranging waste collection in densely populated urban areas. However, limited information is available on the environmental impacts of this system. In this study, we compare the environmental sustainability of conventional door-to-door waste collection with its hypothetical pneumatic alternative. Furthermore, we analyse whether the size of the hypothetical pneumatic system, or the number of waste fractions included, have an impact on the results. Environmental loads are calculated for a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system modelled on an existing dense urban area in Helsinki, Finland, and the results are compared to those of the prevailing, container-based, door-to-door waste collection system. The evaluation method used is the life-cycle inventory (LCI). In this study, we report the atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), SO2 and NOx. The results indicate that replacing the prevailing system with stationary pneumatic waste collection in an existing urban infrastructure would increase total air emissions. Locally, in the waste collection area, emissions would nonetheless diminish, as collection traffic decreases. While the electricity consumption of the hypothetical pneumatic system and the origin of electricity have a significant bearing on the results, emissions due to manufacturing the system’s components prove decisive.
ISSN:0956-053X
1879-2456
DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.003