What Is the Best Way to Contour Lung Tumors on PET Scans? Multiobserver Validation of a Gradient-Based Method Using a NSCLC Digital PET Phantom

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy and consistency of a gradient-based positron emission tomography (PET) segmentation method, GRADIENT, compared with manual (MANUAL) and constant threshold (THRESHOLD) methods. Methods and Materials Contouring accuracy was evaluated with sphere phantoms and clinically...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2012-03, Vol.82 (3), p.1164-1171
Hauptverfasser: Werner-Wasik, Maria, M.D, Nelson, Arden D., Ph.D, Choi, Walter, M.D, Arai, Yoshio, M.D, Faulhaber, Peter F., M.D, Kang, Patrick, M.D, Almeida, Fabio D., M.D, Xiao, Ying, Ph.D, Ohri, Nitin, M.D, Brockway, Kristin D., B.S, Piper, Jonathan W., B.S, Nelson, Aaron S., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the accuracy and consistency of a gradient-based positron emission tomography (PET) segmentation method, GRADIENT, compared with manual (MANUAL) and constant threshold (THRESHOLD) methods. Methods and Materials Contouring accuracy was evaluated with sphere phantoms and clinically realistic Monte Carlo PET phantoms of the thorax. The sphere phantoms were 10–37 mm in diameter and were acquired at five institutions emulating clinical conditions. One institution also acquired a sphere phantom with multiple source-to-background ratios of 2:1, 5:1, 10:1, 20:1, and 70:1. One observer segmented (contoured) each sphere with GRADIENT and THRESHOLD from 25% to 50% at 5% increments. Subsequently, seven physicians segmented 31 lesions (7–264 mL) from 25 digital thorax phantoms using GRADIENT, THRESHOLD, and MANUAL. Results For spheres 20 mm ( p < 0.065) and
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.055