Active Lithium Injection for a Real Time Control of the Divertor Heat Flux for Fusion Devices

When the local heat flux exceeds specified flux limit, tungsten PFC surfaces can be damaged, which is not acceptable for a reliable reactor operations. The divertor PFCs are typically designed for a specific heat flux limit usually assuming an average steady-state heat flux which is typically 5–10 M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of fusion energy 2023-10, Vol.42 (2), p.51, Article 51
Hauptverfasser: Ono, M., Raman, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:When the local heat flux exceeds specified flux limit, tungsten PFC surfaces can be damaged, which is not acceptable for a reliable reactor operations. The divertor PFCs are typically designed for a specific heat flux limit usually assuming an average steady-state heat flux which is typically 5–10 MW/m 2 . However, in addition to steady-state heat flux, fusion reactor divertor PFCs could experience transient heat fluxes such as ELMs and/or other magnetic reconnection events which can deposit large transient heat fluxes onto the divertor PFCs. The transient divertor heat flux could be significantly larger than the steady-state heat flux which could damage the solid PFC surfaces. The divertor heat flux can be subjected to additional complications such as the uncertainties in the the divertor strike point heat flux projection. Moreover, there are additional experimental observations of non-axisymmetric power flux which can occur under non-axisymmetric magnetic perturbations. The liquid lithium (LL) PFCs is more resilient against such transient heat fluxes as they could evaporate LL as needed and the lost LL can be then replenished afterward. In this paper, we analyze a case for a transient divertor heat pulse of 1 MJ in 10 ms for a ITER-size reactor. This is a small perturbation (~ 0.1%) to the expected plasma stored energy compared to the previously analyzed case of 20 MJ heat pulse. Even with this relatively modest heat pulse, the LL surface undergoes ~ 100 °C temperature rise. However, the resulting LL surface heating without rapid cooldown mechanism could lead to excessive LL evaporation continuing well after the transient heat flux resulting in a significant Li injection of ~ 0.6 mol in about a 200 ms period. This amount of Li injection could cause plasma dilution and performance degradation. On the other hand, an active Li injection capability if optimized could prevent the LL surface temperature rise and thus reducing subsequent Li evaporation into the plasma by a factor of 7 compared to the passive LL PFC case. A crucial tool of active Li injection is a rapid response pellet injector which could inject light impurity pellets before the excessive heat flux could reach the divertor plate causing serious damage. A simple pellet ablation model suggests a favorable pellet deposition profile for smaller ~ 0.1 mm radius pellet with ~ 10–20 m/s velocity. Moreover, if it is possible to inject from the private flux region, the pellet injection efficiency into t
ISSN:1572-9591
0164-0313
1572-9591
DOI:10.1007/s10894-023-00387-3