Comparison of Nodal Risk Formula and MR Lymphography for Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer

Purpose To compare the nodal risk formula (NRF) as a predictor for lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with prostate cancer with magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) using Ultrasmall Super-Paramagnetic particles of Iron Oxide (USPIO) and with histology as gold standard. Methods and Materials Log...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2011-09, Vol.81 (1), p.8-15
Hauptverfasser: Deserno, Willem M.L.L.G., M.D., M.Sc, Debats, Oscar A., M.D., M.Sc, Rozema, Tom, M.D, Fortuin, Ansje S., M.D, Heesakkers, Roel A.M., M.D, Hoogeveen, Yvonne, Ph.D, Peer, Petronella G.M., Ph.D, Barentsz, Jelle O., M.D., Ph.D, van Lin, Emile N.J.T., M.D., Ph.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To compare the nodal risk formula (NRF) as a predictor for lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with prostate cancer with magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) using Ultrasmall Super-Paramagnetic particles of Iron Oxide (USPIO) and with histology as gold standard. Methods and Materials Logistic regression analysis was performed with the results of histopathological evaluation of the LN as dependent variable and the nodal risk according to the NRF and the result of MRL as independent input variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the performance of the models. Results The analysis included 375 patients. In the single-predictor regression models, the NRF and MRL results were both significantly ( p
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.043