Assessment of Intrafractional Movement and Internal Motion in Radiotherapy of Rectal Cancer Using Megavoltage Computed Tomography

Purpose The aim of this study was to provide estimates of setup and internal margins of patients treated for rectal carcinoma using helical tomotherapy and to assess possible margin adaptations. Using helical tomotherapy, highly conformal dose distributions can be created, and the integrated megavol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2008-07, Vol.71 (3), p.934-939
Hauptverfasser: Tournel, Koen, M.Sc, De Ridder, Mark, M.D., Ph.D, Engels, Benedikt, M.D, Bijdekerke, Paul, Bs.N, Fierens, Yves, M.Sc, Duchateau, Michael, M.Sc, Linthout, Nadine, Ph.D, Reynders, Truus, M.Sc, Verellen, Dirk, Ph.D, Storme, Guy, M.D., Ph.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The aim of this study was to provide estimates of setup and internal margins of patients treated for rectal carcinoma using helical tomotherapy and to assess possible margin adaptations. Using helical tomotherapy, highly conformal dose distributions can be created, and the integrated megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) modality allows very precise daily patient positioning. In clinical protocols, however, margins originating from traditional setup procedures are still being applied. This work investigates whether this modality can aid in redefining treatment margins. Methods and Materials Ten patients who were treated with tomotherapy underwent MVCT scanning before and after 10 treatments. Using automatic registration the necessary setup margin was investigated by means of bony landmarks. Internal margins were assessed by delineating and describing the mesorectal movement. Results Based on bony landmarks, movement of patients during treatments was limited to 2.45 mm, 1.99 mm, and 1.09 mm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction, respectively. Systematic errors were limited to
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.032