Expanded analysis of machine learning models for nuclear transient identification using TPOT

•Tests the ability of non-neural network machine learning models to classify several possible transient events within a nuclear reactor.•Analyzes the areas where the best performing models misclassify data points.•Examines the impact in model validation results if key features are removed.•Examines...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear engineering and design 2022-04, Vol.390, p.111694, Article 111694
Hauptverfasser: Mena, Pedro, Borrelli, R.A., Kerby, Leslie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Tests the ability of non-neural network machine learning models to classify several possible transient events within a nuclear reactor.•Analyzes the areas where the best performing models misclassify data points.•Examines the impact in model validation results if key features are removed.•Examines the impact changes in random states have on the best performing models. Industries around the world are becoming more and more data driven. The nuclear field is no exception with several different applications being proposed. One popular area of research is the use of machine learning in transient detection. This paper seeks to build upon a previous study which made use of the AutoML package TPOT to train traditional machine learning models to classify transient events occurring with a reactor. Synthetic data was once again collected using a GPWR reactor simulator. Data on 12 different events was collected using 15 different initial conditions. A dataset consisting of over 100,000 data points was compiled and used to train 7 different machine learning models using a pre-defined TPOT dictionary with 12 different preprocessing techniques. Three of the trained models were able to produce validation results in the 90s with the expanded dataset. Once the models were trained, it was possible to look into where during the simulation, misclassifications occurred. Using these three models, analysis was done to determine if TPOT could be used to train models that were effective if important features were missing. The results from this were positive with the newly trained models scoring close to the original models. Finally, to conclude this study, the three high performing models were retrained using different random states to see if there was any major variation when different states were used.
ISSN:0029-5493
1872-759X
DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111694